Electromagnetic Damping: A Closer Look at a Contactless Braking System

A magnet oscillating on a spring above a coil is a standard demonstration of contactless electromagnetic braking, normally confirmed by showing that the electromagnetic part of the damping scales as 1/R, the inverse of the coil circuit's resistance. In our version of the experiment the damping did not change, within the 4% run-to-run scatter, between 15 Ω and 2.2 MΩ. Using a US$43 data-acquisition system built around a Raspberry Pi Pico, we trace this null result to the measuring circuit: the coil was closed only through the amplifier's 1 MΩ bias resistor, so about 16 nA flowed and electromagnetic braking was a few millionths of the total damping. A second hidden error was the clock. Mains hum appeared at 63 Hz instead of 50 Hz because the firmware's sampling loop ran slower than assumed, by a factor of 1.261 ± 0.013; the oscillation frequencies in phone videos of the runs give 1.2618 ± 0.0003 independently. With both errors understood, the oscillator's damping, γ = (11.3 ± 0.3) × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ (mean ± SD of seven videos) for spring 1, does not come from the coil and decays faster at large amplitude. We describe a corrected circuit and five checks that would have caught both errors. Data, firmware, hardware files and analysis code: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23448904

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23449035
Primary Topic
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Electromagnetic Damping: A Closer Look at a Contactless Braking System

Muhammad Umer Farooq, Hassan Malik, Hardyesh Kumar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
preprint

Electromagnetic Damping: A Closer Look at a Contactless Braking System

Muhammad Umer Farooq, Hassan Malik, Hardyesh Kumar
preprint en

Abstract

A magnet oscillating on a spring above a coil is a standard demonstration of contactless electromagnetic braking, normally confirmed by showing that the electromagnetic part of the damping scales as 1/R, the inverse of the coil circuit's resistance. In our version of the experiment the damping did not change, within the 4% run-to-run scatter, between 15 Ω and 2.2 MΩ. Using a US$43 data-acquisition system built around a Raspberry Pi Pico, we trace this null result to the measuring circuit: the coil was closed only through the amplifier's 1 MΩ bias resistor, so about 16 nA flowed and electromagnetic braking was a few millionths of the total damping. A second hidden error was the clock. Mains hum appeared at 63 Hz instead of 50 Hz because the firmware's sampling loop ran slower than assumed, by a factor of 1.261 ± 0.013; the oscillation frequencies in phone videos of the runs give 1.2618 ± 0.0003 independently. With both errors understood, the oscillator's damping, γ = (11.3 ± 0.3) × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ (mean ± SD of seven videos) for spring 1, does not come from the coil and decays faster at large amplitude. We describe a corrected circuit and five checks that would have caught both errors. Data, firmware, hardware files and analysis code: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23448904

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blackstone (United States) (US)
Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.