Post-Quantum Oblivious Transfer for Oblivious Inference on Resource-Constrained Devices

Oblivious inference (OI) systems such as MiniONN, GAZELLE and DELPHI rely on oblivious transfer (OT) bootstrapped from base OTs whose security rests on CDH or DDH, which Shor’s algorithm breaks; for longlived IIoT deployments, Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later makes this a current concern. We review post-quantum (PQ) OT protocols published 2008–2026 against five axes: UC security, adversarial model, security model (ROM, QROM, CRS, standard model), round complexity, and reported benchmarks. Within our corpus, only lattice-based OT has measured performance on ARM application-class cores: ROTed reports 191 µs (286.5 k cycles) per ROT on a Cortex-A72, excluding network latency and randomness generation. Isogeny-based OT has the smallest messages but no reported implementation. We find two gaps: no implemented PQ base OT that UC-realises standard or random OT has a QROM proof, while the RO-free UC constructions are unimplemented; and no PQ base OT has been measured on microcontroller-class hardware.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23460176
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Quantum Oblivious Transfer for Oblivious Inference on Resource-Constrained Devices

Lohith Senthilkumar, Aaditya Rengarajan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cryptography and Data Security
article

Post-Quantum Oblivious Transfer for Oblivious Inference on Resource-Constrained Devices

Lohith Senthilkumar, Aaditya Rengarajan
article en

Abstract

Oblivious inference (OI) systems such as MiniONN, GAZELLE and DELPHI rely on oblivious transfer (OT) bootstrapped from base OTs whose security rests on CDH or DDH, which Shor’s algorithm breaks; for longlived IIoT deployments, Harvest-Now-Decrypt-Later makes this a current concern. We review post-quantum (PQ) OT protocols published 2008–2026 against five axes: UC security, adversarial model, security model (ROM, QROM, CRS, standard model), round complexity, and reported benchmarks. Within our corpus, only lattice-based OT has measured performance on ARM application-class cores: ROTed reports 191 µs (286.5 k cycles) per ROT on a Cortex-A72, excluding network latency and randomness generation. Isogeny-based OT has the smallest messages but no reported implementation. We find two gaps: no implemented PQ base OT that UC-realises standard or random OT has a QROM proof, while the RO-free UC constructions are unimplemented; and no PQ base OT has been measured on microcontroller-class hardware.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
North Carolina State University (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.