Rasch analysis of an intimate partner violence tool for healthcare students

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, and healthcare professionals are in a unique position to identify and support individuals experiencing IPV. However, research highlights gaps in healthcare professionals' readiness to address IPV. The Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) is a validated instrument used to assess clinical readiness, but its application among students remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PREMIS subscales for perceived preparation (PP) and perceived knowledge (PK) using the Rasch Rating Scale Model among students. A total of 381 students from the medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry programs at an academic medical center participated in an interprofessional educational activity related to IPV and completed an adapted version of the PREMIS instrument. After excluding respondents with complete non-responses, 307 students were included. Rasch analyses assessed the dimensionality, item fit, rating-scale functioning, item difficulty, and person ability of the PP and PK subscales separately, and examined differential item functioning across professional group and sex. Rasch analysis supported the unidimensionality of the PP and PK subscales. Most items demonstrated acceptable fit statistics. The rating scale functioned well after the two lowest categories were collapsed. Items varied in difficulty, allowing for effective discrimination of student readiness levels, while demonstrating reduced discrimination at higher ability levels. No items showed bias across professional groups or sex. Findings support the validity evidence of PREMIS PP and PK subscales when used with healthcare students. Validating this tool in a student population lays the groundwork for evaluating IPV education and developing interventions to improve IPV preparedness across healthcare disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-03058-8
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rasch analysis of an intimate partner violence tool for healthcare students

Sally R. Earl, Kim G. Adcock, Marie Barnard, Patricia K. Digby et al.
Discover Public Health
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Rasch analysis of an intimate partner violence tool for healthcare students

Sally R. Earl, Kim G. Adcock, Marie Barnard, Patricia K. Digby, Shadi Bazzazzadehgan, Sai Veeramachaneni, Minsoo Kang
article en

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, and healthcare professionals are in a unique position to identify and support individuals experiencing IPV. However, research highlights gaps in healthcare professionals' readiness to address IPV. The Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) is a validated instrument used to assess clinical readiness, but its application among students remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PREMIS subscales for perceived preparation (PP) and perceived knowledge (PK) using the Rasch Rating Scale Model among students. A total of 381 students from the medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry programs at an academic medical center participated in an interprofessional educational activity related to IPV and completed an adapted version of the PREMIS instrument. After excluding respondents with complete non-responses, 307 students were included. Rasch analyses assessed the dimensionality, item fit, rating-scale functioning, item difficulty, and person ability of the PP and PK subscales separately, and examined differential item functioning across professional group and sex. Rasch analysis supported the unidimensionality of the PP and PK subscales. Most items demonstrated acceptable fit statistics. The rating scale functioned well after the two lowest categories were collapsed. Items varied in difficulty, allowing for effective discrimination of student readiness levels, while demonstrating reduced discrimination at higher ability levels. No items showed bias across professional groups or sex. Findings support the validity evidence of PREMIS PP and PK subscales when used with healthcare students. Validating this tool in a student population lays the groundwork for evaluating IPV education and developing interventions to improve IPV preparedness across healthcare disciplines.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
University of Mississippi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.