Capacity and Disposition: A Framework for Understanding GenAI Engagement in Assessment Practice

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has made assessment work faster, messier, and more consequential. This conceptual article argues that assessment professionals’ engagement with GenAI is shaped less by simple enthusiasm or resistance than by the relationship between two conditions: the time professionals have to learn, test, and implement AI responsibly, and the disposition they bring to AI-mediated assessment practice. Institutional support functions as the environment that expands or constrains both. The article proposes the Capacity-Disposition Framework, a model that identifies four engagement conditions: The Calendar Trap, The Margin Lab, The Evidence Gate, and The Practice Commons. The framework helps assessment leaders diagnose uneven AI adoption, protect time for meaningful experimentation, honor appropriate skepticism, and connect AI use to validity, equity, transparency, and continuous improvement rather than speed alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61669/001c.172677
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity and Disposition: A Framework for Understanding GenAI Engagement in Assessment Practice

Warren F. Miller
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Capacity and Disposition: A Framework for Understanding GenAI Engagement in Assessment Practice

Warren F. Miller
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has made assessment work faster, messier, and more consequential. This conceptual article argues that assessment professionals’ engagement with GenAI is shaped less by simple enthusiasm or resistance than by the relationship between two conditions: the time professionals have to learn, test, and implement AI responsibly, and the disposition they bring to AI-mediated assessment practice. Institutional support functions as the environment that expands or constrains both. The article proposes the Capacity-Disposition Framework, a model that identifies four engagement conditions: The Calendar Trap, The Margin Lab, The Evidence Gate, and The Practice Commons. The framework helps assessment leaders diagnose uneven AI adoption, protect time for meaningful experimentation, honor appropriate skepticism, and connect AI use to validity, equity, transparency, and continuous improvement rather than speed alone.

Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and LearningVol. 7(5)
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Capacity and Disposition: A Framework for Understanding GenAI Engagement in Assessment Practice — Warren F. Miller · Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS