Adoptability of PPP Models to Overcome Procurement Issues in Affordable Housing Projects

Abstract Urbanization has caused severe housing issues related to affordability in urban areas. In Colombo, Sri Lanka, middle-income earners are more vulnerable to housing issues due to housing unaffordability and demand supply imbalances, and structural and distributional issues. However, public–private partnership (PPP) models have been successfully initiated in addressing urban housing affordability issues worldwide. Hence, this research aimed to investigate the adaptability of PPP models to overcome procurement issues in state-sector middle-income housing projects in Sri Lanka. The aim was accomplished via a three rounds of the Delphi approach by collecting data through semistructured interviews from experts. Collected data were analyzed through manual content analysis via three-phase coding. Findings revealed that PPP models, joint venture, concession, design–build–finance–operate–maintain (DBFOM), build–own–operate–transfer (BOOT), lease–develop–operate, design–build–finance–operate (DBFO), mixed PPP, and build-lease-transfer (BLT) offer viable alternatives for addressing challenges in delivery of affordable housing in Sri Lanka through conventional public-sector procurement methods. Key PPP features identified as critical to overcoming existing procurement issues include partnership and collaboration, shared risks and responsibilities, private funding, innovation and efficiency, value for money, and digital transformation. However, weak regulatory frameworks, lack of sector-specific PPP policies, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and absence of a central authority were highlighted as barriers to implementation of PPPs. The findings offer a foundation for countries that share similar socioeconomic backgrounds, particularly for developing countries, to consider PPP models in delivery of affordable housing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1674
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoptability of PPP Models to Overcome Procurement Issues in Affordable Housing Projects

B.A.K.S. Perera, M. M. N. Mannapperuma, A. A. D. N. Anuradha
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Adoptability of PPP Models to Overcome Procurement Issues in Affordable Housing Projects

B.A.K.S. Perera, M. M. N. Mannapperuma, A. A. D. N. Anuradha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Urbanization has caused severe housing issues related to affordability in urban areas. In Colombo, Sri Lanka, middle-income earners are more vulnerable to housing issues due to housing unaffordability and demand supply imbalances, and structural and distributional issues. However, public–private partnership (PPP) models have been successfully initiated in addressing urban housing affordability issues worldwide. Hence, this research aimed to investigate the adaptability of PPP models to overcome procurement issues in state-sector middle-income housing projects in Sri Lanka. The aim was accomplished via a three rounds of the Delphi approach by collecting data through semistructured interviews from experts. Collected data were analyzed through manual content analysis via three-phase coding. Findings revealed that PPP models, joint venture, concession, design–build–finance–operate–maintain (DBFOM), build–own–operate–transfer (BOOT), lease–develop–operate, design–build–finance–operate (DBFO), mixed PPP, and build-lease-transfer (BLT) offer viable alternatives for addressing challenges in delivery of affordable housing in Sri Lanka through conventional public-sector procurement methods. Key PPP features identified as critical to overcoming existing procurement issues include partnership and collaboration, shared risks and responsibilities, private funding, innovation and efficiency, value for money, and digital transformation. However, weak regulatory frameworks, lack of sector-specific PPP policies, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and absence of a central authority were highlighted as barriers to implementation of PPPs. The findings offer a foundation for countries that share similar socioeconomic backgrounds, particularly for developing countries, to consider PPP models in delivery of affordable housing.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 19(1)
University of Moratuwa (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.