Building patient safety: A normative framework for health information management professionals

BACKGROUND: The study focused on how health information management (HIM) professionals in Australia contribute to patient safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop a normative framework that illustrates how the values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HIM professionals influence patient safety across various governance domains. METHOD: Utilising findings from mixed-method data collection, the research drew on insights from HIM professionals and patient safety experts, using grounded theory strategies for data analysis. RESULTS: The results are organised within a house-themed normative framework, which positions core professional values as the foundation of HIM practice. These values inform shared beliefs regarding patient safety, supporting clinicians, data accuracy and continuous learning. The attitudes of person-centredness, governance and speaking up mediate the enactment of these beliefs. The corresponding behaviours visibly demonstrate HIM contributions across four governance domains: clinical, corporate, data and information. DISCUSSION: Patient safety literature centres on clinical roles. As healthcare becomes increasingly data-driven, the risk of patient harm arising from information, data quality and governance failures grows. There is a notable gap in the conceptual frameworks that articulate how HIM professionals contribute to patient safety beyond their functional tasks, especially from a normative professional identity perspective. CONCLUSION: This framework highlights HIM professionals as integral contributors to patient safety rather than supportive background figures. It provides clarity for education, workforce development and health policy, thereby enhancing recognition of the governance and system impact of HIM practice on patient safety.Implications for health information management practice:(a) This framework provides a mechanism to visualise the values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HIM professionals towards patient safety and the domains in which their outputs are seen; and (b) demonstrate how involvement of HIM professionals in patient safety will enable the profession to be better utilised, understood and valued in the health system and inform education, workforce development and health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583261490959
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building patient safety: A normative framework for health information management professionals

Kerryn A Butler-Henderson, Salma Arabi, Trixie Kemp, Jennifer Ayton
Health Information Management Journal
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Building patient safety: A normative framework for health information management professionals

Kerryn A Butler-Henderson, Salma Arabi, Trixie Kemp, Jennifer Ayton
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study focused on how health information management (HIM) professionals in Australia contribute to patient safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop a normative framework that illustrates how the values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HIM professionals influence patient safety across various governance domains. METHOD: Utilising findings from mixed-method data collection, the research drew on insights from HIM professionals and patient safety experts, using grounded theory strategies for data analysis. RESULTS: The results are organised within a house-themed normative framework, which positions core professional values as the foundation of HIM practice. These values inform shared beliefs regarding patient safety, supporting clinicians, data accuracy and continuous learning. The attitudes of person-centredness, governance and speaking up mediate the enactment of these beliefs. The corresponding behaviours visibly demonstrate HIM contributions across four governance domains: clinical, corporate, data and information. DISCUSSION: Patient safety literature centres on clinical roles. As healthcare becomes increasingly data-driven, the risk of patient harm arising from information, data quality and governance failures grows. There is a notable gap in the conceptual frameworks that articulate how HIM professionals contribute to patient safety beyond their functional tasks, especially from a normative professional identity perspective. CONCLUSION: This framework highlights HIM professionals as integral contributors to patient safety rather than supportive background figures. It provides clarity for education, workforce development and health policy, thereby enhancing recognition of the governance and system impact of HIM practice on patient safety.Implications for health information management practice:(a) This framework provides a mechanism to visualise the values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours of HIM professionals towards patient safety and the domains in which their outputs are seen; and (b) demonstrate how involvement of HIM professionals in patient safety will enable the profession to be better utilised, understood and valued in the health system and inform education, workforce development and health policy.

Health Information Management Journal
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.