Engaging Patient Communities in Intracranial Neuroscience Research

Patients who participate in intracranial neuroscience research make invaluable contributions to our understanding of the brain, accelerating the development of neurotechnological interventions. Engagement of patients as part of this research presents unique challenges, where study goals can be distant from immediate clinical applications and require specialized domain knowledge. Yet methods for meaningfully integrating patient communities as part of these research efforts are essential, as intracranial neuroscience guides the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for understanding and enhancing human cognition. In order to identify what patients consider meaningful research engagement we interviewed individuals who participated in a study during their Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery and attended a group event where they interacted with our research team. Analysis of semi-structured interviews identified four main themes: interest in science and the future of clinical care, contributing to science to improve lives, connecting with others, and accessibility considerations. Based on these insights, we propose strategies for transformational participation of patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research with respect to engagement objectives, communication and scope. This approach offers a foundation for sustaining relationships between scientists and communities rooted in trust and transparency, to ensure that impacts of AI-driven neurotechnology on human health and cognition are aligned with patient needs as well as desired public values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroethics
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-026-09679-9
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging Patient Communities in Intracranial Neuroscience Research

Ashley E. Walton, Erika Versalovic, Amanda R. Merner, Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz et al.
Neuroethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Engaging Patient Communities in Intracranial Neuroscience Research

Ashley E. Walton, Erika Versalovic, Amanda R. Merner, Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz, Robert Mark Richardson, Alan Bush
article en

Abstract

Patients who participate in intracranial neuroscience research make invaluable contributions to our understanding of the brain, accelerating the development of neurotechnological interventions. Engagement of patients as part of this research presents unique challenges, where study goals can be distant from immediate clinical applications and require specialized domain knowledge. Yet methods for meaningfully integrating patient communities as part of these research efforts are essential, as intracranial neuroscience guides the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for understanding and enhancing human cognition. In order to identify what patients consider meaningful research engagement we interviewed individuals who participated in a study during their Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery and attended a group event where they interacted with our research team. Analysis of semi-structured interviews identified four main themes: interest in science and the future of clinical care, contributing to science to improve lives, connecting with others, and accessibility considerations. Based on these insights, we propose strategies for transformational participation of patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research with respect to engagement objectives, communication and scope. This approach offers a foundation for sustaining relationships between scientists and communities rooted in trust and transparency, to ensure that impacts of AI-driven neurotechnology on human health and cognition are aligned with patient needs as well as desired public values.

NeuroethicsVol. 19(3)
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.