Cultural Context Matters: Development of South African Reference Values for the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–second edition (Ages 6–12 Years)

BACKGROUND: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (MABC‑2), is widely used internationally to identify motor coordination difficulties. However, reliance on "imported" Western European norms for score interpretation in culturally and socio‑economically diverse contexts remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to quantify the magnitude of normative divergence and to establish contextually representative benchmarks, using a large sample of South African children as a model for local norm development. METHODS: Local reference values were developed using anonymized data from 2064 South African children aged 6-12 years, stratified by socioeconomic level and sex. Raw scores were converted to scaled scores to generate percentile ranks and age‑band cut‑off values. Comparative analyses examined differences in score distributions between the imported Dutch/Flemish norms and the newly derived local reference values. RESULTS: All MABC‑2 items showed statistically significant differences between imported and locally derived reference values (p < 0.001), with item‑level effect sizes (Hedges' g) ranging from 0.49 to 2.12. Applying the Dutch/Flemish norms to this cohort resulted in 29% of children scoring below the 5th percentile, compared with the expected 5% under the local normative distribution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that motor performance benchmarks are not globally interchangeable. Reliance on imported norms leads to substantial shifts in classification rates, increasing the risk of over‑identification of motor difficulties in non‑Western contexts. Establishing local reference values provides a more equitable framework for clinical interpretation and supports the need for culturally and contextually appropriate motor assessment practices worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105404
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Context Matters: Development of South African Reference Values for the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–second edition (Ages 6–12 Years)

Anita Elizabeth Pienaar, Evi Verbecque, Dané Coetzee, Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Cultural Context Matters: Development of South African Reference Values for the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–second edition (Ages 6–12 Years)

Anita Elizabeth Pienaar, Evi Verbecque, Dané Coetzee, Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (MABC‑2), is widely used internationally to identify motor coordination difficulties. However, reliance on "imported" Western European norms for score interpretation in culturally and socio‑economically diverse contexts remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to quantify the magnitude of normative divergence and to establish contextually representative benchmarks, using a large sample of South African children as a model for local norm development. METHODS: Local reference values were developed using anonymized data from 2064 South African children aged 6-12 years, stratified by socioeconomic level and sex. Raw scores were converted to scaled scores to generate percentile ranks and age‑band cut‑off values. Comparative analyses examined differences in score distributions between the imported Dutch/Flemish norms and the newly derived local reference values. RESULTS: All MABC‑2 items showed statistically significant differences between imported and locally derived reference values (p < 0.001), with item‑level effect sizes (Hedges' g) ranging from 0.49 to 2.12. Applying the Dutch/Flemish norms to this cohort resulted in 29% of children scoring below the 5th percentile, compared with the expected 5% under the local normative distribution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that motor performance benchmarks are not globally interchangeable. Reliance on imported norms leads to substantial shifts in classification rates, increasing the risk of over‑identification of motor difficulties in non‑Western contexts. Establishing local reference values provides a more equitable framework for clinical interpretation and supports the need for culturally and contextually appropriate motor assessment practices worldwide.

Research in Developmental DisabilitiesVol. 178
North-West University (ZA), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ), Hasselt University (BE)
National Research Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.