Automated ICON scoring from orthodontic photographs: a deep learning-based model that learns from the clinical assessment of three orthodontists

Abstract Background Manual scoring of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) is laborious and observer-dependent. We developed a deep-learning model that learns from three orthodontists’ ICON assessments to classify treatment need from routine clinical photographs. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study, 565 patients (2018–2025) were scored independently by three orthodontists. Five standard photographs per patient (frontal, two lateral, two occlusal) were encoded by a DINOv3-Large Vision Transformer with low-rank adaptation and fused by a two-layer Transformer encoder. Patients were split into a held-out test set ( n = 85) and a development set ( n = 480) used for five-fold cross-validation with two seeds. The decision threshold was pre-specified; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed by 2,000-iteration bootstrap. Results Inter-rater agreement at the ICON ≥ 43 cut-off was fair (Fleiss κ = 0.262). On the held-out set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI, 0.829–0.958) and average precision 0.965 (0.942–0.985); a permutation test rejected chance ( P < 0.001). At the pre-specified threshold, specificity was 1.000 (Wilson CI, 0.857–1.000) but sensitivity was only 0.435 (0.319–0.559). The model also ranked continuous ICON scores (Pearson r = 0.75), indicating that graded severity was captured, although its probability outputs were compressed and were not calibrated to a fixed cut-off. Conclusions A self-supervised Vision Transformer reliably ranks patients by ICON treatment need from routine photographs. Low sensitivity at any fixed cut-off limits screening use; the model is best framed as a referral-prioritisation aid pending multicentre validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-10243-3
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated ICON scoring from orthodontic photographs: a deep learning-based model that learns from the clinical assessment of three orthodontists

Sabahattin Bor, Barış Öztürk, GÖNÜL DİNÇ, Saadet Cinarsoy Cigerim
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Automated ICON scoring from orthodontic photographs: a deep learning-based model that learns from the clinical assessment of three orthodontists

Sabahattin Bor, Barış Öztürk, GÖNÜL DİNÇ, Saadet Cinarsoy Cigerim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Manual scoring of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) is laborious and observer-dependent. We developed a deep-learning model that learns from three orthodontists’ ICON assessments to classify treatment need from routine clinical photographs. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study, 565 patients (2018–2025) were scored independently by three orthodontists. Five standard photographs per patient (frontal, two lateral, two occlusal) were encoded by a DINOv3-Large Vision Transformer with low-rank adaptation and fused by a two-layer Transformer encoder. Patients were split into a held-out test set ( n = 85) and a development set ( n = 480) used for five-fold cross-validation with two seeds. The decision threshold was pre-specified; 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed by 2,000-iteration bootstrap. Results Inter-rater agreement at the ICON ≥ 43 cut-off was fair (Fleiss κ = 0.262). On the held-out set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI, 0.829–0.958) and average precision 0.965 (0.942–0.985); a permutation test rejected chance ( P < 0.001). At the pre-specified threshold, specificity was 1.000 (Wilson CI, 0.857–1.000) but sensitivity was only 0.435 (0.319–0.559). The model also ranked continuous ICON scores (Pearson r = 0.75), indicating that graded severity was captured, although its probability outputs were compressed and were not calibrated to a fixed cut-off. Conclusions A self-supervised Vision Transformer reliably ranks patients by ICON treatment need from routine photographs. Low sensitivity at any fixed cut-off limits screening use; the model is best framed as a referral-prioritisation aid pending multicentre validation.

BMC Oral Health
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Ministry of Health (TR), Inonu University (TR), Education Training And Research (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.