Comparison of PMAneo and RAPID in acute ischemic stroke: agreement in CT perfusion analysis and DEFUSE 3 imaging eligibility

PURPOSE: Automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) analysis plays a key role in triaging acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to evaluate the agreement of PMAneo compared with RAPID in a multicenter setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 99 patients with anterior circulation AIS from three stroke centers using four different CT scanners. CTP data were processed using both PMAneo and RAPID. Volumetric agreement for ischemic core volume and Tmax > 6 s volume was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with volume discrepancies. EVT imaging eligibility was evaluated according to the DEFUSE 3 criteria (ischemic core volume < 70 mL, mismatch ratio ≥ 1.8, and absolute mismatch volume ≥ 15 mL), using RAPID as the comparator. RESULTS: Ischemic core volumes showed excellent agreement between the two platforms (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI 0.827-0.918), and Tmax > 6 s volumes showed good agreement (ICC = 0.761, 95% CI 0.283-0.896), whereas mismatch volumes showed moderate agreement (ICC = 0.661, 95% CI 0.146-0.844). For the ischemic core threshold (< 70 mL), PMAneo demonstrated 100% (95% CI 96-100%) relative sensitivity and 67% (95% CI 38-88%) relative specificity. For the full DEFUSE 3 criteria, the relative sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI 70-89%) and 84% (95% CI 66-95%), respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated proportional bias, with PMAneo underestimating volumes relative to RAPID as lesion size increased. Basal ganglia involvement and imaging site were significantly associated with these volume differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PMAneo showed high volumetric agreement and comparable DEFUSE 3 imaging eligibility to RAPID, suggesting it is a reliable alternative for automated CTP analysis. Although proportional bias and potential diagnostic discrepancies were observed in borderline cases near clinically relevant thresholds, PMAneo may facilitate broader access to automated CTP analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02095-2
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of PMAneo and RAPID in acute ischemic stroke: agreement in CT perfusion analysis and DEFUSE 3 imaging eligibility

Ryosuke Shimura, Keiji Noutomi, Motoma Kanaya, Toshiyuki Onda et al.
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Comparison of PMAneo and RAPID in acute ischemic stroke: agreement in CT perfusion analysis and DEFUSE 3 imaging eligibility

Ryosuke Shimura, Keiji Noutomi, Motoma Kanaya, Toshiyuki Onda, Kohsuke Kudo, Yukie Shimizu, Taisuke Harada, Hiroyuki Kameda, Noriyuki Fujima, Yohei Ikebe, Bunya Takahashi, Manabu Shirakawa, Shinichi Yoshimura, Manabu Inoue, Yuki Takano, Koki Iura, Mari Anzai, Kazuma Ishibashi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) analysis plays a key role in triaging acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to evaluate the agreement of PMAneo compared with RAPID in a multicenter setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 99 patients with anterior circulation AIS from three stroke centers using four different CT scanners. CTP data were processed using both PMAneo and RAPID. Volumetric agreement for ischemic core volume and Tmax > 6 s volume was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with volume discrepancies. EVT imaging eligibility was evaluated according to the DEFUSE 3 criteria (ischemic core volume < 70 mL, mismatch ratio ≥ 1.8, and absolute mismatch volume ≥ 15 mL), using RAPID as the comparator. RESULTS: Ischemic core volumes showed excellent agreement between the two platforms (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI 0.827-0.918), and Tmax > 6 s volumes showed good agreement (ICC = 0.761, 95% CI 0.283-0.896), whereas mismatch volumes showed moderate agreement (ICC = 0.661, 95% CI 0.146-0.844). For the ischemic core threshold (< 70 mL), PMAneo demonstrated 100% (95% CI 96-100%) relative sensitivity and 67% (95% CI 38-88%) relative specificity. For the full DEFUSE 3 criteria, the relative sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI 70-89%) and 84% (95% CI 66-95%), respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated proportional bias, with PMAneo underestimating volumes relative to RAPID as lesion size increased. Basal ganglia involvement and imaging site were significantly associated with these volume differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PMAneo showed high volumetric agreement and comparable DEFUSE 3 imaging eligibility to RAPID, suggesting it is a reliable alternative for automated CTP analysis. Although proportional bias and potential diagnostic discrepancies were observed in borderline cases near clinically relevant thresholds, PMAneo may facilitate broader access to automated CTP analysis.

Japanese Journal of Radiology
Hyogo Medical University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), Micron (Japan) (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP), Sapporo Shiroishi Memorial Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.