Constructing Mutuality in Nurse–Woman–Relative Caring Relationships Informed by Human Caring Theory: A Substantive Theory From a Constructivist Grounded Theory Study

AIM: This study aimed to examine how mutuality is experienced, constructed and negotiated within caring relationships among nurses, women and relatives in women's health nursing. DESIGN: The study followed a theory-research-theory strategy, within which Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology guided the empirical stage. METHOD: In the initial theoretical stage, the Human Caring Theory was used as a sensitizing theoretical lens. During the empirical stage, the study employed Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology and included 14 nurses, 18 women and 18 relatives recruited from obstetric and gynaecological settings. Data were collected through observations and individual interviews and analysed through initial coding, focused coding, constant comparison, memo-writing and theoretical integration. In the final stage, only after the categories and their relationships had been developed from the data were they integrated into a context-sensitive substantive theory, subsequently named 'Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships'. RESULTS: Two core categories, six categories and 13 subcategories were identified in the constructivist grounded theory data analysis. Under the core category of 'nature of mutuality', categories included 'establishing and sustaining the caring connection', 'conditions shaping relational engagement', 'forms of mutuality' and 'perceived mutual healing and transformation'. Under the core category of 'unrealized caring experience' categories of 'relational disconnection' and 'consequences of relational challenges' were identified. The Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships theory was developed from data generated using constructivist grounded theory, resulting in a context-sensitive substantive theory. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that mutuality in women's health nursing is a context-dependent relational process shaped by humanistic understanding, compassionate engagement and what participants described metaphorically as relational energy among nurses, women and relatives. Participants described two forms of mutuality-unconditional and partial-and indicated that the process could be initiated, sustained, constrained or remain unrealized. Unrealized caring experiences were perceived to be associated with relational disconnection and difficulties in communication, participation in care and well-being. Further research is needed to refine the Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships substantive theory and examine its transferability and practical usefulness across diverse women's health settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There is no patient or public contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70324
Primary Topic
Nursing care and research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Mutuality in Nurse–Woman–Relative Caring Relationships Informed by Human Caring Theory: A Substantive Theory From a Constructivist Grounded Theory Study

İlkay Boz, Burcu Erduran, Marcia D. Hills
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Nursing care and research
article

Constructing Mutuality in Nurse–Woman–Relative Caring Relationships Informed by Human Caring Theory: A Substantive Theory From a Constructivist Grounded Theory Study

İlkay Boz, Burcu Erduran, Marcia D. Hills
article en

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to examine how mutuality is experienced, constructed and negotiated within caring relationships among nurses, women and relatives in women's health nursing. DESIGN: The study followed a theory-research-theory strategy, within which Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology guided the empirical stage. METHOD: In the initial theoretical stage, the Human Caring Theory was used as a sensitizing theoretical lens. During the empirical stage, the study employed Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology and included 14 nurses, 18 women and 18 relatives recruited from obstetric and gynaecological settings. Data were collected through observations and individual interviews and analysed through initial coding, focused coding, constant comparison, memo-writing and theoretical integration. In the final stage, only after the categories and their relationships had been developed from the data were they integrated into a context-sensitive substantive theory, subsequently named 'Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships'. RESULTS: Two core categories, six categories and 13 subcategories were identified in the constructivist grounded theory data analysis. Under the core category of 'nature of mutuality', categories included 'establishing and sustaining the caring connection', 'conditions shaping relational engagement', 'forms of mutuality' and 'perceived mutual healing and transformation'. Under the core category of 'unrealized caring experience' categories of 'relational disconnection' and 'consequences of relational challenges' were identified. The Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships theory was developed from data generated using constructivist grounded theory, resulting in a context-sensitive substantive theory. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that mutuality in women's health nursing is a context-dependent relational process shaped by humanistic understanding, compassionate engagement and what participants described metaphorically as relational energy among nurses, women and relatives. Participants described two forms of mutuality-unconditional and partial-and indicated that the process could be initiated, sustained, constrained or remain unrealized. Unrealized caring experiences were perceived to be associated with relational disconnection and difficulties in communication, participation in care and well-being. Further research is needed to refine the Constructing Mutuality in Caring Relationships substantive theory and examine its transferability and practical usefulness across diverse women's health settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There is no patient or public contribution.

Scandinavian Journal of Caring SciencesVol. 40(4)
Akdeniz University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nursing care and research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.