Operationalizing systems thinking in water governance: A framework for advancing regional water security

Despite major advances in hydrological science and water management technologies, regional /national water crises persist. This study argues that these challenges arise less from scientific limitations than from fragmented governance systems that hinder coordination across sectors, scales, and institutions. We develop a systems governance framework that operationalizes systems thinking by embedding it within institutional practice through four interdependent mechanisms: leadership, organizational coordination, education/institutional learning, and stakeholder platforms (LOEP). Drawing on comparative analysis of China’s River Chief System and the United Kingdom’s Yorkshire Integrated Catchment Solutions Programme, we illustrate how the LOEP governance framework enables coordinated decision-making, policy integration, and sustained implementation. The findings show that systems thinking becomes effective only when supported by institutional arrangements that align knowledge production with governance processes. By reframing systems thinking as an operational governance capacity, this study provides a structured and operational framework that extends beyond existing analytical approaches for policymakers and practitioners seeking to advance water security and sustainability transitions under complex socio-ecological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104526
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing systems thinking in water governance: A framework for advancing regional water security

Jouni Paavola, Joseph Holden, Martin R. Tillotson, Julia Martín-Ortega et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Operationalizing systems thinking in water governance: A framework for advancing regional water security

Jouni Paavola, Joseph Holden, Martin R. Tillotson, Julia Martín-Ortega, Glen M. Sproul Dit MacDonald, Chansheng He, Lee E. Brown, Gordon Mitchell, Anna L. Mdee
article en

Abstract

Despite major advances in hydrological science and water management technologies, regional /national water crises persist. This study argues that these challenges arise less from scientific limitations than from fragmented governance systems that hinder coordination across sectors, scales, and institutions. We develop a systems governance framework that operationalizes systems thinking by embedding it within institutional practice through four interdependent mechanisms: leadership, organizational coordination, education/institutional learning, and stakeholder platforms (LOEP). Drawing on comparative analysis of China’s River Chief System and the United Kingdom’s Yorkshire Integrated Catchment Solutions Programme, we illustrate how the LOEP governance framework enables coordinated decision-making, policy integration, and sustained implementation. The findings show that systems thinking becomes effective only when supported by institutional arrangements that align knowledge production with governance processes. By reframing systems thinking as an operational governance capacity, this study provides a structured and operational framework that extends beyond existing analytical approaches for policymakers and practitioners seeking to advance water security and sustainability transitions under complex socio-ecological systems.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 185
University of Leeds (GB), Western Michigan University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Lanzhou University (CN)
US-UK Fulbright Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.