The Association of Metoprolol Use With Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

This cohort study investigates the comparative health outcomes of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) treated with and without metoprolol, a commonly prescribed betablocker.Utilizing data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network comprising 70 healthcare organizations, the study defines two propensity score-matched cohorts: HFpEF patients without metoprolol and those receiving metoprolol, excluding individuals with atrial fibrillation.Key outcomes assessed include mortality, HF exacerbation, and incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Statistical analyses, including risk ratios (RRs) and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, were employed to evaluate differences between cohorts.All RRS are reported for the non-metoprolol cohort (Cohort 1) relative to the metoprolol cohort (Cohort 2, reference group), so that an RR below 1.00 denotes a lower risk of the outcome in patients not treated with metoprolol, and all absolute risk differences (ARDs) are calculated as the event rate in the metoprolol cohort minus the event rate in the non-metoprolol cohort.The results demonstrate that HFpEF patients not treated with metoprolol had comparatively lower risks of mortality (15.51% vs. 18.54%;ARD: 3.03%; RR: 0.886, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.868-0.903),HF exacerbations (6.76% vs. 8.90%; ARD: 2.14%; RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.765-0.815),and CKD (11.80% vs. 14.49%;ARD: 2.69%; RR: 0.838, 95% CI: 0.816-0.861)compared to those receiving metoprolol.Survival analysis further supports this association, indicating significantly higher survival probabilities in the non-metoprolol cohort.These findings suggest that metoprolol was associated with increased mortality in HFpEF patients.There may be some increased risk in HFpEF patients; however, given the retrospective observational design of the study, these findings indicate an association rather than a causal relationship, and residual confounding cannot be ruled out.Further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the effects of metoprolol and optimize management strategies for this complex patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118054
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association of Metoprolol Use With Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Eric J Basile, Chirag Lodha
Cureus
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

The Association of Metoprolol Use With Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Eric J Basile, Chirag Lodha
article en

Abstract

This cohort study investigates the comparative health outcomes of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) treated with and without metoprolol, a commonly prescribed betablocker.Utilizing data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network comprising 70 healthcare organizations, the study defines two propensity score-matched cohorts: HFpEF patients without metoprolol and those receiving metoprolol, excluding individuals with atrial fibrillation.Key outcomes assessed include mortality, HF exacerbation, and incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Statistical analyses, including risk ratios (RRs) and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, were employed to evaluate differences between cohorts.All RRS are reported for the non-metoprolol cohort (Cohort 1) relative to the metoprolol cohort (Cohort 2, reference group), so that an RR below 1.00 denotes a lower risk of the outcome in patients not treated with metoprolol, and all absolute risk differences (ARDs) are calculated as the event rate in the metoprolol cohort minus the event rate in the non-metoprolol cohort.The results demonstrate that HFpEF patients not treated with metoprolol had comparatively lower risks of mortality (15.51% vs. 18.54%;ARD: 3.03%; RR: 0.886, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.868-0.903),HF exacerbations (6.76% vs. 8.90%; ARD: 2.14%; RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.765-0.815),and CKD (11.80% vs. 14.49%;ARD: 2.69%; RR: 0.838, 95% CI: 0.816-0.861)compared to those receiving metoprolol.Survival analysis further supports this association, indicating significantly higher survival probabilities in the non-metoprolol cohort.These findings suggest that metoprolol was associated with increased mortality in HFpEF patients.There may be some increased risk in HFpEF patients; however, given the retrospective observational design of the study, these findings indicate an association rather than a causal relationship, and residual confounding cannot be ruled out.Further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the effects of metoprolol and optimize management strategies for this complex patient population.

Cureus
University of South Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Association of Metoprolol Use With Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study — Eric J Basile, Chirag Lodha · Cureus (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS