Advancing waste-derived feedstocks valorization and cleaner coal utilization: A critical review of co-gasification synergistic mechanisms, process optimization, multiscale modeling, and prospects

Coal and waste-derived feedstocks co-gasification is a promising strategy for waste valorization and cleaner coal utilization by integrating the high energy density and process stability of coal with the high volatile content, reactivity, and inherent mineral catalytic components of waste-derived feedstocks. This review critically summarizes recent progress in coal and waste-derived feedstocks co-gasification, focusing on feedstock complementarity, synergistic mechanisms, key operating parameters, alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEM) behavior, reactor type, and multiscale modeling approaches. The analysis shows that co-gasification performance is not a simple linear combination of individual feedstocks. Both synergistic and inhibitory effects have been reported, indicating that synergy is a conditional phenomenon governed by feedstock composition, AAEM availability, K–Si–Al interactions, Ca competitive reactions, temperature, gasifying agent, blending ratio, and reactor type. In particular, total AAEM content alone is insufficient to predict gasification behavior. The speciation, mobility, and accessibility of K, Na, and Ca, as well as their interactions with Si and Al, determine whether AAEM promote char gasification or become deactivated through stable silicate and aluminosilicate formation. Therefore, K/Si, K/Al, and Ca/(Si + Al) ratios can serve as useful indicators for interpreting the transition from catalytic promotion to mineral-induced inhibition, but they should not be regarded as universal thresholds. This review also discusses the applicability of thermodynamic, kinetic, machine learning, and numerical simulation to different research objectives. Future research should emphasize standardized and dynamic synergy evaluation, controlled validation of mineral threshold hypotheses, direct characterization of AAEM migration and deactivation, mechanism-informed catalyst/additive design, and integrated mechanism–model–system frameworks to support scale-up and industrial application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2026.117572
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing waste-derived feedstocks valorization and cleaner coal utilization: A critical review of co-gasification synergistic mechanisms, process optimization, multiscale modeling, and prospects

吴根记, Shuyuan Zhang, Yunan Chen
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Advancing waste-derived feedstocks valorization and cleaner coal utilization: A critical review of co-gasification synergistic mechanisms, process optimization, multiscale modeling, and prospects

吴根记, Shuyuan Zhang, Yunan Chen
article en

Abstract

Coal and waste-derived feedstocks co-gasification is a promising strategy for waste valorization and cleaner coal utilization by integrating the high energy density and process stability of coal with the high volatile content, reactivity, and inherent mineral catalytic components of waste-derived feedstocks. This review critically summarizes recent progress in coal and waste-derived feedstocks co-gasification, focusing on feedstock complementarity, synergistic mechanisms, key operating parameters, alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEM) behavior, reactor type, and multiscale modeling approaches. The analysis shows that co-gasification performance is not a simple linear combination of individual feedstocks. Both synergistic and inhibitory effects have been reported, indicating that synergy is a conditional phenomenon governed by feedstock composition, AAEM availability, K–Si–Al interactions, Ca competitive reactions, temperature, gasifying agent, blending ratio, and reactor type. In particular, total AAEM content alone is insufficient to predict gasification behavior. The speciation, mobility, and accessibility of K, Na, and Ca, as well as their interactions with Si and Al, determine whether AAEM promote char gasification or become deactivated through stable silicate and aluminosilicate formation. Therefore, K/Si, K/Al, and Ca/(Si + Al) ratios can serve as useful indicators for interpreting the transition from catalytic promotion to mineral-induced inhibition, but they should not be regarded as universal thresholds. This review also discusses the applicability of thermodynamic, kinetic, machine learning, and numerical simulation to different research objectives. Future research should emphasize standardized and dynamic synergy evaluation, controlled validation of mineral threshold hypotheses, direct characterization of AAEM migration and deactivation, mechanism-informed catalyst/additive design, and integrated mechanism–model–system frameworks to support scale-up and industrial application.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 244
National Power (United Kingdom) (GB), State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province, Key Technologies Research and Development Program, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
Responsible consumption and production, Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.