Causal analysis of Alzheimer’s disease molecular data

Abstract Background Genome-wide studies have revealed many molecular associations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but association alone does not identify cause, mechanism, or treatable target. This review surveys methods used to infer causal relationships from AD molecular data and assesses their core findings. Main body We reviewed causal-inference work applied to AD genetics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, covering Mendelian randomization, probabilistic graphical and Bayesian network models, causal reasoning over knowledge graphs, time-resolved methods including Granger causality, and mediation analysis. Genetic-instrument and network methods have identified candidate causal molecules, mapped pathways, and supported some drug targets. However, several associations reported in observational studies have not been supported by genetic analyses, and apparent disagreements between studies often reflect differences in the estimand, the tissue from which genetic instruments are derived, or assumptions of the methods used. Conclusion Brain-relevant genetic instruments, longitudinal multi-omics, single-cell resolution, and triangulation across methods are needed to separate cause from consequence and to prioritize intervention targets for experimental validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02235-w
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal analysis of Alzheimer’s disease molecular data

Rebecca Ting Jiin Loo, Enrico Glaab
Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Causal analysis of Alzheimer’s disease molecular data

Rebecca Ting Jiin Loo, Enrico Glaab
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Genome-wide studies have revealed many molecular associations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but association alone does not identify cause, mechanism, or treatable target. This review surveys methods used to infer causal relationships from AD molecular data and assesses their core findings. Main body We reviewed causal-inference work applied to AD genetics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, covering Mendelian randomization, probabilistic graphical and Bayesian network models, causal reasoning over knowledge graphs, time-resolved methods including Granger causality, and mediation analysis. Genetic-instrument and network methods have identified candidate causal molecules, mapped pathways, and supported some drug targets. However, several associations reported in observational studies have not been supported by genetic analyses, and apparent disagreements between studies often reflect differences in the estimand, the tissue from which genetic instruments are derived, or assumptions of the methods used. Conclusion Brain-relevant genetic instruments, longitudinal multi-omics, single-cell resolution, and triangulation across methods are needed to separate cause from consequence and to prioritize intervention targets for experimental validation.

Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
University of Luxembourg (LU), Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LU)
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.