Gender inclusive language in healthcare professionals’ education: a scoping review

Abstract Background Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) individuals experience unique healthcare challenges, with disparities exacerbated by the use of non-inclusive or stigmatising language. Healthcare professionals’ education plays a critical role in fostering inclusive communication, yet existing curricula remain inconsistent and underexplored. Objective This scoping review aimed to map the literature on the use of gender-inclusive language in healthcare education, identify key themes, gaps, and challenges. Methods A systematic search of Embase, OVID MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify studies examining inclusive language within healthcare education. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on the education of healthcare professionals across disciplines and addressing gender-inclusive language as a primary or secondary outcome. Data regarding study characteristics, educational interventions, outcomes, and barriers was extracted. Results Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions using diverse teaching modalities including in-person, online, small-group, simulation, and panel discussions involving individuals with lived experience—improved learners’ self- reported confidence and knowledge of inclusive language. However, long-term behavioural change was rarely measured. Curriculum coverage of LGBTQ+ topics was inconsistent, often fragmented or optional. Key barriers included limited curricular time, lack of standardized assessment tools, and conflicts between personal beliefs and professional responsibilities. Conclusion Learners demonstrate motivation to engage with gender-inclusive education. However, inconsistent curricula and structural barriers hinder comprehensive implementation. Interventions incorporating lived experience and multiple teaching modalities show promise, but evidence of sustained behaviour change is limited. Further research could provide clarity on the most efficacious teaching modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10576-1
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender inclusive language in healthcare professionals’ education: a scoping review

Mehak Chandanani, Kim A Walker, Vidyut Chattopadhyay
BMC Medical Education
Gender Studies in Language
article

Gender inclusive language in healthcare professionals’ education: a scoping review

Mehak Chandanani, Kim A Walker, Vidyut Chattopadhyay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) individuals experience unique healthcare challenges, with disparities exacerbated by the use of non-inclusive or stigmatising language. Healthcare professionals’ education plays a critical role in fostering inclusive communication, yet existing curricula remain inconsistent and underexplored. Objective This scoping review aimed to map the literature on the use of gender-inclusive language in healthcare education, identify key themes, gaps, and challenges. Methods A systematic search of Embase, OVID MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify studies examining inclusive language within healthcare education. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on the education of healthcare professionals across disciplines and addressing gender-inclusive language as a primary or secondary outcome. Data regarding study characteristics, educational interventions, outcomes, and barriers was extracted. Results Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions using diverse teaching modalities including in-person, online, small-group, simulation, and panel discussions involving individuals with lived experience—improved learners’ self- reported confidence and knowledge of inclusive language. However, long-term behavioural change was rarely measured. Curriculum coverage of LGBTQ+ topics was inconsistent, often fragmented or optional. Key barriers included limited curricular time, lack of standardized assessment tools, and conflicts between personal beliefs and professional responsibilities. Conclusion Learners demonstrate motivation to engage with gender-inclusive education. However, inconsistent curricula and structural barriers hinder comprehensive implementation. Interventions incorporating lived experience and multiple teaching modalities show promise, but evidence of sustained behaviour change is limited. Further research could provide clarity on the most efficacious teaching modality.

BMC Medical Education
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being, Quality education, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.