Preoperative Predictors and Scoring System for Incisional Hernia: A Case–Control Study

Objective Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication of abdominal surgery; preoperative identification of high-risk patients enables targeted prevention. We aimed to identify independent preoperative predictors of IH and to derive a simple risk-stratification score in a Thai population. Methods We conducted a retrospective, matched 1:1 case–control study at Vajira Hospital, comparing 100 patients who developed an IH after abdominal surgery with 100 patients who did not, individually matched on type of operation. Preoperative variables ascertained before the index operation were analysed by conditional logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test; internal validity was examined by 1000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results Six independent preoperative predictors were identified: hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% CI 1.53–12.46), diabetes (OR 4.20, 1.11–15.89), female sex (OR 3.66, 1.20–11.15), previous abdominal operation (OR 3.25, 1.37–7.72), body mass index (OR 1.24 per kg/m 2 , 1.10–1.41), and age (OR 1.05 per year, 1.01–1.09). The model showed good discrimination (apparent AUC 0.82; optimism-corrected AUC 0.80) and good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.72). A 6-factor points score stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Conclusion Six routinely available preoperative factors independently predict IH and can be combined into a practical risk-stratification score to support individualized counselling and preventive strategies. Because of the case–control design, the score stratifies relative risk and is not intended to estimate absolute probability; external, prospective validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.186347.1
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Predictors and Scoring System for Incisional Hernia: A Case–Control Study

Suksan Kanoksin, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn, Krin Muangnoijaroen
F1000Research
Hernia repair and management
article

Preoperative Predictors and Scoring System for Incisional Hernia: A Case–Control Study

Suksan Kanoksin, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn, Krin Muangnoijaroen
article en

Abstract

Objective Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication of abdominal surgery; preoperative identification of high-risk patients enables targeted prevention. We aimed to identify independent preoperative predictors of IH and to derive a simple risk-stratification score in a Thai population. Methods We conducted a retrospective, matched 1:1 case–control study at Vajira Hospital, comparing 100 patients who developed an IH after abdominal surgery with 100 patients who did not, individually matched on type of operation. Preoperative variables ascertained before the index operation were analysed by conditional logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test; internal validity was examined by 1000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results Six independent preoperative predictors were identified: hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% CI 1.53–12.46), diabetes (OR 4.20, 1.11–15.89), female sex (OR 3.66, 1.20–11.15), previous abdominal operation (OR 3.25, 1.37–7.72), body mass index (OR 1.24 per kg/m 2 , 1.10–1.41), and age (OR 1.05 per year, 1.01–1.09). The model showed good discrimination (apparent AUC 0.82; optimism-corrected AUC 0.80) and good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.72). A 6-factor points score stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Conclusion Six routinely available preoperative factors independently predict IH and can be combined into a practical risk-stratification score to support individualized counselling and preventive strategies. Because of the case–control design, the score stratifies relative risk and is not intended to estimate absolute probability; external, prospective validation is warranted.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Navamindradhiraj University (TH), Chulabhorn Graduate Institute (TH), Chulabhorn Hospital (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.