Intentional Replantation of Permanent Teeth for Endodontic Indications: An Umbrella Review of Clinical Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Evidence Quality

This umbrella review synthesized evidence on the outcomes and prognostic factors of intentional replantation and assessed the methodological quality and primary-study overlap of existing systematic reviews. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis evaluating intentional replantation in permanent teeth were included. Seven reviews met the eligibility criteria. Reported pooled survival ranged from 85.9% to 89.1%, while success or healing ranged from 77.23% to 80.2%; however, this consistency must be interpreted cautiously due to very high primary-study overlap across the reviews. Evidence for prognostic factors was inconsistent, with several commonly proposed procedural factors lacking significant associations in pooled analyses. Five reviews had critically low confidence, and one had low confidence according to AMSTAR 2. Intentional replantation can achieve favourable tooth-retention outcomes in selected permanent teeth; however, confidence in current estimates is limited by methodological weaknesses, predominantly observational primary evidence and substantial evidence overlap. Higher-quality prospective and comparative studies are required. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD420261453494.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70131
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intentional Replantation of Permanent Teeth for Endodontic Indications: An Umbrella Review of Clinical Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Evidence Quality

Sharma Rahul, Harshita Wadhwa, Jigyasa Duhan
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Intentional Replantation of Permanent Teeth for Endodontic Indications: An Umbrella Review of Clinical Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Evidence Quality

Sharma Rahul, Harshita Wadhwa, Jigyasa Duhan
article en

Abstract

This umbrella review synthesized evidence on the outcomes and prognostic factors of intentional replantation and assessed the methodological quality and primary-study overlap of existing systematic reviews. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis evaluating intentional replantation in permanent teeth were included. Seven reviews met the eligibility criteria. Reported pooled survival ranged from 85.9% to 89.1%, while success or healing ranged from 77.23% to 80.2%; however, this consistency must be interpreted cautiously due to very high primary-study overlap across the reviews. Evidence for prognostic factors was inconsistent, with several commonly proposed procedural factors lacking significant associations in pooled analyses. Five reviews had critically low confidence, and one had low confidence according to AMSTAR 2. Intentional replantation can achieve favourable tooth-retention outcomes in selected permanent teeth; however, confidence in current estimates is limited by methodological weaknesses, predominantly observational primary evidence and substantial evidence overlap. Higher-quality prospective and comparative studies are required. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD420261453494.

Australian Endodontic Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.