In search of learning for all in Botswana: The role of conceptions of educational equity

To better understand how and why educational policies and practices designed to increase the quality of learning for all may not succeed in doing so, we take up a conceptual question that is underexplored in global education: what does it mean to increase the quality of learning for all? To do so, we examine the case of Botswana through Levinson et al.’s conceptions of educational equity and trade-offs. We combine historical process tracing with a 2017 empirical study of student-level literacy assessments and classroom observations. Our analysis reveals ways in which conceptions of equity influence students’ literacy outcomes and teachers’ pedagogical practices. Botswana has, since Independence, acted on conceptions of equity related to equal allocation of resources and equal experiences for all students. We find that, while foundational, these conceptions of equity also acted as barriers to equal learning outcomes and educational adequacy, which require consideration of differential resources and/or experiences. We argue that conceptions of equity can provide a useful framework in future work aimed toward expanded educational goals and learning for all globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Research in Education
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785261492652
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In search of learning for all in Botswana: The role of conceptions of educational equity

Nkobi Owen Pansiri, Paola Uccelli, Bethany Mulimbi, Felipe Barrera‐Osorio et al.
Theory and Research in Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

In search of learning for all in Botswana: The role of conceptions of educational equity

Nkobi Owen Pansiri, Paola Uccelli, Bethany Mulimbi, Felipe Barrera‐Osorio, Sarah Dryden‐Peterson, Charles B. Gale, Kgosi Motshabi
article en

Abstract

To better understand how and why educational policies and practices designed to increase the quality of learning for all may not succeed in doing so, we take up a conceptual question that is underexplored in global education: what does it mean to increase the quality of learning for all? To do so, we examine the case of Botswana through Levinson et al.’s conceptions of educational equity and trade-offs. We combine historical process tracing with a 2017 empirical study of student-level literacy assessments and classroom observations. Our analysis reveals ways in which conceptions of equity influence students’ literacy outcomes and teachers’ pedagogical practices. Botswana has, since Independence, acted on conceptions of equity related to equal allocation of resources and equal experiences for all students. We find that, while foundational, these conceptions of equity also acted as barriers to equal learning outcomes and educational adequacy, which require consideration of differential resources and/or experiences. We argue that conceptions of equity can provide a useful framework in future work aimed toward expanded educational goals and learning for all globally.

Theory and Research in Education
Harvard University (US), University of Botswana (BW), Vanderbilt University (US), Southern African Development Community (BW), Edgewood Independent School District (US)
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Quality education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.