Implementing the EU Deforestation Regulation with an equity perspective and its potential regulatory impacts on forests and livelihoods

The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) seeks to ban commodities associated with deforestation from the EU market. Even though uncertainty about regulatory enforcement and its impacts persists, governments, companies and civil society in origin countries of cocoa, coffee and other commodities are already engaging in complex implementation processes. This study aims at tracing the implementation processes of the EUDR in Peru, and it examines how equity in implementation processes may shape emerging impacts of the EUDR on forests and livelihoods. We use an in-depth case-study research design in the Peruvian cocoa and coffee sectors. Our results show how the EUDR has triggered changes in public policy and service provision, in geolocation, traceability and due diligence systems as well as in Peru's international cooperation projects. Indicators of distributive, procedural and recognitional equity show both advances and limitations. An equity-inspired approach suggests that a shift in language from zero-deforestation towards forest conservation as well as an emphasis on domestic value creation and capturing may promote more positive impacts of EUDR on forests and livelihoods, but we do not find indications how an equity approach in EUDR implementation may prevent agricultural expansion and trade diversion. This study may inspire analyses of networks of implementation processes, and it suggests to conceive equity not only as an outcome or assessment framework but also a factor to explain and a means to promote intended impacts on forests and livelihoods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2026-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103936
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing the EU Deforestation Regulation with an equity perspective and its potential regulatory impacts on forests and livelihoods

Jimena Solar, Yovita Ivanova, Christoph Oberlack, Karin Ingold
Forest Policy and Economics
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Implementing the EU Deforestation Regulation with an equity perspective and its potential regulatory impacts on forests and livelihoods

Jimena Solar, Yovita Ivanova, Christoph Oberlack, Karin Ingold
article en

Abstract

The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) seeks to ban commodities associated with deforestation from the EU market. Even though uncertainty about regulatory enforcement and its impacts persists, governments, companies and civil society in origin countries of cocoa, coffee and other commodities are already engaging in complex implementation processes. This study aims at tracing the implementation processes of the EUDR in Peru, and it examines how equity in implementation processes may shape emerging impacts of the EUDR on forests and livelihoods. We use an in-depth case-study research design in the Peruvian cocoa and coffee sectors. Our results show how the EUDR has triggered changes in public policy and service provision, in geolocation, traceability and due diligence systems as well as in Peru's international cooperation projects. Indicators of distributive, procedural and recognitional equity show both advances and limitations. An equity-inspired approach suggests that a shift in language from zero-deforestation towards forest conservation as well as an emphasis on domestic value creation and capturing may promote more positive impacts of EUDR on forests and livelihoods, but we do not find indications how an equity approach in EUDR implementation may prevent agricultural expansion and trade diversion. This study may inspire analyses of networks of implementation processes, and it suggests to conceive equity not only as an outcome or assessment framework but also a factor to explain and a means to promote intended impacts on forests and livelihoods.

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 192
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Bioversity International (CO), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Life on land, Responsible consumption and production, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.