CAESIUM 137 IN FOOD AND DRINKING WATER IN KASHKADARYA AND THE LIMITS OF DIETARY EXPOSURE INFERENCE

This analytical review considers a reported Kashkadarya dataset comprising 12 plant-food samples, five meat samples and four drinking-water samples. The supplied caesium manuscript reports average Cs-137 activities of 1.7 ± 0.4 Bq/kg in plant foods, 7.1 ± 4.2 Bq/kg in meat and 0.08 ± 0.05 Bq/kg in water. Ratios to the source-listed comparison values were 1.42%, 4.44% and 0.73% respectively. The article separates food concentration from intake and dose, and explains why the observed ordering does not establish biological accumulation. A summary table and ratio chart provide a descriptive comparison. The results justify continued food-specific surveillance, while individual dose estimation requires consumption information, measurement uncertainty and a confirmed exposure model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Web of Medicine: Journal of Medicine, Practice and Nursing
Published
2026-10-15
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CAESIUM 137 IN FOOD AND DRINKING WATER IN KASHKADARYA AND THE LIMITS OF DIETARY EXPOSURE INFERENCE

Valeriya Saipova, Khojiakbarkhoja Akhrorov, Sarvar Samadov, Dilorom Sheralieva et al.
Web of Medicine: Journal of Medicine, Practice and Nursing
Radioactive contamination and transfer
article

CAESIUM 137 IN FOOD AND DRINKING WATER IN KASHKADARYA AND THE LIMITS OF DIETARY EXPOSURE INFERENCE

Valeriya Saipova, Khojiakbarkhoja Akhrorov, Sarvar Samadov, Dilorom Sheralieva, Firuza Yuldasheva, Javokhirbek Uktamov
article en

Abstract

This analytical review considers a reported Kashkadarya dataset comprising 12 plant-food samples, five meat samples and four drinking-water samples. The supplied caesium manuscript reports average Cs-137 activities of 1.7 ± 0.4 Bq/kg in plant foods, 7.1 ± 4.2 Bq/kg in meat and 0.08 ± 0.05 Bq/kg in water. Ratios to the source-listed comparison values were 1.42%, 4.44% and 0.73% respectively. The article separates food concentration from intake and dose, and explains why the observed ordering does not establish biological accumulation. A summary table and ratio chart provide a descriptive comparison. The results justify continued food-specific surveillance, while individual dose estimation requires consumption information, measurement uncertainty and a confirmed exposure model.

Web of Medicine: Journal of Medicine, Practice and Nursing
Tashkent State Medical University (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.