Augmenting Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Dynamic Manufacturing Risk Assessment

Conventional Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) is linear and does not explicitly include a systems-based perspective that accounts for the complexity in which all manufacturing systems operate. In an illustrative case study using hypothetical inputs, this study augments traditional PFMEA methods with a Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) approach. We suggest a Leverage Impact Number (LIN) that quantifies modeled system-wide risk reduction to include the impacts of individual intervention options available to decision-makers to better quantify risk, but also the relative contribution of management intervention to reduce those risks. Rank comparisons examine changes in priorities and an analysis of concepts covered only by the FCM considers organizational factors. Monte Carlo perturbations assess sensitivity to causal weights, and one-way analyses examine risk weighting, mitigation levels, driver baselines, transfer-function steepness, and the update rule. When traditional PFMEA is compared with our FCM-augmented approach, our results indicate that LIN and Risk Priority Number (RPN) rankings are moderately correlated in this illustrative case, with the augmented approach retaining key PFMEA priorities while extending the analysis to modeled system-wide intervention effects. Under reference assumptions, combined stressors increase modeled risk by approximately the sum of their separate effects. These results demonstrate additional decision support information under the same stated assumptions when using PFMEA and our FCM-augmented method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14101310
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmenting Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Dynamic Manufacturing Risk Assessment

Amin Sehati, Steven A. Gray
Systems
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Augmenting Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Dynamic Manufacturing Risk Assessment

Amin Sehati, Steven A. Gray
article en

Abstract

Conventional Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) is linear and does not explicitly include a systems-based perspective that accounts for the complexity in which all manufacturing systems operate. In an illustrative case study using hypothetical inputs, this study augments traditional PFMEA methods with a Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) approach. We suggest a Leverage Impact Number (LIN) that quantifies modeled system-wide risk reduction to include the impacts of individual intervention options available to decision-makers to better quantify risk, but also the relative contribution of management intervention to reduce those risks. Rank comparisons examine changes in priorities and an analysis of concepts covered only by the FCM considers organizational factors. Monte Carlo perturbations assess sensitivity to causal weights, and one-way analyses examine risk weighting, mitigation levels, driver baselines, transfer-function steepness, and the update rule. When traditional PFMEA is compared with our FCM-augmented approach, our results indicate that LIN and Risk Priority Number (RPN) rankings are moderately correlated in this illustrative case, with the augmented approach retaining key PFMEA priorities while extending the analysis to modeled system-wide intervention effects. Under reference assumptions, combined stressors increase modeled risk by approximately the sum of their separate effects. These results demonstrate additional decision support information under the same stated assumptions when using PFMEA and our FCM-augmented method.

SystemsVol. 14(10)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.