Circulating proteomic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes: a comprehensive pan-cancer review of pre-treatment cohorts

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer management; nevertheless, a large number of patients fail to respond to treatment. Despite extensive research efforts, there is a lack of accurate non-invasive biomarkers for prognosis and treatment outcome prediction. In this systematic review, we aim to record and evaluate studies investigating blood-circulating protein biomarkers and their association with ICIs outcomes. A literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library (on December 18, 2025) for studies investigating plasma biomarkers in ICI-treated cohorts at baseline was performed. Results were synthesized across cancer types and proteomic technologies, based on a vote-counting approach. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A total of 49 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The majority of these studies focused on lung cancer ( n = 21) and melanoma ( n = 13) and used Olink ( n = 23) and mass spectrometry ( n = 15) platforms. Synthesis of the results revealed that high pre-treatment systemic levels of IL-6, CXCL8, ANGPT2, CRP, CCL3, CSF1, CXCL10, TNFSF14, and SAA1/2 were associated with poorer outcomes in ICI treated patients, while elevated levels of soluble T-cell ligands (ICOSLG, TNFSF10, and FASLG) and CXCL5 were reproducibly correlated with improved treatment outcomes. To conclude, despite limitations linked to the heterogeneity of proteomic platforms and variability in outcome reporting across studies, consistent patterns emerged: markers of systemic inflammation were associated with poor response, while proteins involved in T-cell activation and signaling were linked to better outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Proteomics
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-026-09642-z
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating proteomic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes: a comprehensive pan-cancer review of pre-treatment cohorts

Maria Frantzi, Antonia Vlahou, Aggeliki Tserga, Theodoros Margelos
Clinical Proteomics
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Circulating proteomic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes: a comprehensive pan-cancer review of pre-treatment cohorts

Maria Frantzi, Antonia Vlahou, Aggeliki Tserga, Theodoros Margelos
article en

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer management; nevertheless, a large number of patients fail to respond to treatment. Despite extensive research efforts, there is a lack of accurate non-invasive biomarkers for prognosis and treatment outcome prediction. In this systematic review, we aim to record and evaluate studies investigating blood-circulating protein biomarkers and their association with ICIs outcomes. A literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library (on December 18, 2025) for studies investigating plasma biomarkers in ICI-treated cohorts at baseline was performed. Results were synthesized across cancer types and proteomic technologies, based on a vote-counting approach. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A total of 49 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The majority of these studies focused on lung cancer ( n = 21) and melanoma ( n = 13) and used Olink ( n = 23) and mass spectrometry ( n = 15) platforms. Synthesis of the results revealed that high pre-treatment systemic levels of IL-6, CXCL8, ANGPT2, CRP, CCL3, CSF1, CXCL10, TNFSF14, and SAA1/2 were associated with poorer outcomes in ICI treated patients, while elevated levels of soluble T-cell ligands (ICOSLG, TNFSF10, and FASLG) and CXCL5 were reproducibly correlated with improved treatment outcomes. To conclude, despite limitations linked to the heterogeneity of proteomic platforms and variability in outcome reporting across studies, consistent patterns emerged: markers of systemic inflammation were associated with poor response, while proteins involved in T-cell activation and signaling were linked to better outcomes.

Clinical Proteomics
Academy of Athens (GR), Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens (GR), Mosaiques Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.