The Theory of Coping via Differentiating and Integrating for Adapting: Introducing the CODIA model

This paper introduces the new “Theory of Coping via Differentiation and Integration for Adapting” (CODIA). The two foundational models, IC (cognitive processing) and ADAPT (psychosocial systems), have developed independently over several decades, but have never been combined into one theory and model of how coping leads to adapting. We suggest that there is a causal relationship between coping, differentiation, integration, and adapting, but the mechanisms between coping and adapting have not been conceptualised. Based on our new theory, we propose a CODIA framework through which we suggest operationalisations for each construct. For example, coping begins with appraising a stressor and approaching or avoiding, which leads to differentiation (seeing different elements of, or viewpoints about, the stressor) and subsequently integration (seeing links among the elements and/or viewpoints) and finally adapting. While IC was the foundation for the development of our mediating model, ADAPT was the foundation for the inclusion of five anticipated moderation effects (existential meaning, safety/ security, bonds/networks, justice, roles/identities). We conclude with a proposed research agenda, asking questions about different experiences of stressors, learning to adapt over time, and whether there is such a thing as “perfect” adapting in any situation? This paper offers an integrated and coherent theory of coping and adapting, CODIA, with a set of hypothesised relationships that may offer and advance the grounding of the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.135653
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Theory of Coping via Differentiating and Integrating for Adapting: Introducing the CODIA model

Chris Baumann, Eolene Boyd-MacMillan, Derrick Silove, Valerie DeMarinis
Apollo
Resilience and Mental Health
article

The Theory of Coping via Differentiating and Integrating for Adapting: Introducing the CODIA model

Chris Baumann, Eolene Boyd-MacMillan, Derrick Silove, Valerie DeMarinis
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces the new “Theory of Coping via Differentiation and Integration for Adapting” (CODIA). The two foundational models, IC (cognitive processing) and ADAPT (psychosocial systems), have developed independently over several decades, but have never been combined into one theory and model of how coping leads to adapting. We suggest that there is a causal relationship between coping, differentiation, integration, and adapting, but the mechanisms between coping and adapting have not been conceptualised. Based on our new theory, we propose a CODIA framework through which we suggest operationalisations for each construct. For example, coping begins with appraising a stressor and approaching or avoiding, which leads to differentiation (seeing different elements of, or viewpoints about, the stressor) and subsequently integration (seeing links among the elements and/or viewpoints) and finally adapting. While IC was the foundation for the development of our mediating model, ADAPT was the foundation for the inclusion of five anticipated moderation effects (existential meaning, safety/ security, bonds/networks, justice, roles/identities). We conclude with a proposed research agenda, asking questions about different experiences of stressors, learning to adapt over time, and whether there is such a thing as “perfect” adapting in any situation? This paper offers an integrated and coherent theory of coping and adapting, CODIA, with a set of hypothesised relationships that may offer and advance the grounding of the field.

Apollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.