One Dose versus Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G in Early Syphilis in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite the current recommendations of the CDC and IUSTI, controversy persists regarding the adequate dose and duration of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for early syphilis in people living with HIV (PLWH). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to October 2025 for studies comparing a single-dose versus a 3-dose BPG regimen in PLWH with early syphilis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome included serologic cure, defined as a ≥4-fold (2-dilution) decline from baseline in antibody titers measured by nontreponemal (lipoidal antigen) tests, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests, at 6 and 12 months. A total of 8 studies, including 2randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6observational studies, were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in serologic cure between a single-dose versus 3-dose BPG at 6months (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07; P = 0.95) or 12 months (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.04; P = 0.46). Overall, our pooled results did not show a significant difference between single-dose and 3-dose BPG. However, our study did not evaluate selected high-risk subgroups, particularly individuals with advanced immunosuppression or untreated HIV infection. Thus, a potential benefit of enhanced therapy in these specific populations cannot be entirely ruled out, underscoring the need for future RCTs focused on these subgroups and designed to stratify or adjust for key disease-modifying factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0000000000002437
Primary Topic
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Dose versus Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G in Early Syphilis in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ayşe Deniz Gökengin, Sümeyye Aktaş, Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos, Martin Cevallos‐Cueva et al.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

One Dose versus Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G in Early Syphilis in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ayşe Deniz Gökengin, Sümeyye Aktaş, Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos, Martin Cevallos‐Cueva, Henry J.C. de Vries, Lorena Oliveira Fonseca, Luiza Fenalte Streher
article en

Abstract

Despite the current recommendations of the CDC and IUSTI, controversy persists regarding the adequate dose and duration of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for early syphilis in people living with HIV (PLWH). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to October 2025 for studies comparing a single-dose versus a 3-dose BPG regimen in PLWH with early syphilis. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome included serologic cure, defined as a ≥4-fold (2-dilution) decline from baseline in antibody titers measured by nontreponemal (lipoidal antigen) tests, including rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests, at 6 and 12 months. A total of 8 studies, including 2randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6observational studies, were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in serologic cure between a single-dose versus 3-dose BPG at 6months (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07; P = 0.95) or 12 months (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.04; P = 0.46). Overall, our pooled results did not show a significant difference between single-dose and 3-dose BPG. However, our study did not evaluate selected high-risk subgroups, particularly individuals with advanced immunosuppression or untreated HIV infection. Thus, a potential benefit of enhanced therapy in these specific populations cannot be entirely ruled out, underscoring the need for future RCTs focused on these subgroups and designed to stratify or adjust for key disease-modifying factors.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases
University of Minnesota (US), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), Ege University (TR), Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR), Franciscan University (BR), Ministerio de Salud Pública (EC), MNGI Digestive Health (US), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.