Mistrust, uncertainty, fear, and vaccine acceptability: quasi-experimental data from the United Kingdom and Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic

Using a quasi-experimental design, this study tests a cognitive-affective model of vaccine acceptability focusing on the effects of relationships between trust, certainty, attitudes, and fear in a sample of 1132 adults in the UK (N = 648 [51.7%]) and Portugal (N = 486 [48.3%]) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A path model of the relationships between the variables was assessed using structural equation modeling. Participants in the experimental condition were asked to list what they thought were the major societal uncertainties concerning the COVID-19 vaccines (N = 566 [49.9%]). When subsequently asked, those in the experimental condition reported lower vaccine certainty than those in the control condition (N = 568 [50.1%]). Across the entire sample, lower vaccine certainty was associated with lower vaccine acceptability. Higher vaccine uncertainty was associated with less negativity toward vaccine refusers (which in turn was associated with lower vaccine acceptability). In addition to the direct positive effect of trust in science and scientists upon vaccine acceptability, there were mediated effects: higher trust in science and scientists was associated with higher fear. Fear was positively associated with vaccine certainty. Fear was also positively associated with negativity toward vaccine refusers. The results suggest that, in health crises, people may be more susceptible to identify with other vaccine refusers (and potentially ‘anti-vaxxer’ groups) if levels of uncertainty and mistrust are higher, thereby undermining vaccine uptake. The study makes an original contribution to the literature on vaccine acceptability by showing that vaccine certainty (and changes in vaccine acceptability) can be modified by a single intervention that asks people to describe what they think are important vaccine uncertainties. Furthermore, by examining the relationship of attitudes to ‘anti-vaxxers’ with the cognitive-affective model of vaccine acceptability, the research indicates the potential significance of uncertainty and fear upon social attitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2026.2750426
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mistrust, uncertainty, fear, and vaccine acceptability: quasi-experimental data from the United Kingdom and Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic

Glynis M. Breakwell, Rusi Jaspal
1 links
Journal of Risk Research
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Mistrust, uncertainty, fear, and vaccine acceptability: quasi-experimental data from the United Kingdom and Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic

Glynis M. Breakwell, Rusi Jaspal
article en

Abstract

Using a quasi-experimental design, this study tests a cognitive-affective model of vaccine acceptability focusing on the effects of relationships between trust, certainty, attitudes, and fear in a sample of 1132 adults in the UK (N = 648 [51.7%]) and Portugal (N = 486 [48.3%]) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A path model of the relationships between the variables was assessed using structural equation modeling. Participants in the experimental condition were asked to list what they thought were the major societal uncertainties concerning the COVID-19 vaccines (N = 566 [49.9%]). When subsequently asked, those in the experimental condition reported lower vaccine certainty than those in the control condition (N = 568 [50.1%]). Across the entire sample, lower vaccine certainty was associated with lower vaccine acceptability. Higher vaccine uncertainty was associated with less negativity toward vaccine refusers (which in turn was associated with lower vaccine acceptability). In addition to the direct positive effect of trust in science and scientists upon vaccine acceptability, there were mediated effects: higher trust in science and scientists was associated with higher fear. Fear was positively associated with vaccine certainty. Fear was also positively associated with negativity toward vaccine refusers. The results suggest that, in health crises, people may be more susceptible to identify with other vaccine refusers (and potentially ‘anti-vaxxer’ groups) if levels of uncertainty and mistrust are higher, thereby undermining vaccine uptake. The study makes an original contribution to the literature on vaccine acceptability by showing that vaccine certainty (and changes in vaccine acceptability) can be modified by a single intervention that asks people to describe what they think are important vaccine uncertainties. Furthermore, by examining the relationship of attitudes to ‘anti-vaxxers’ with the cognitive-affective model of vaccine acceptability, the research indicates the potential significance of uncertainty and fear upon social attitudes.

Journal of Risk Research
Brighton Hospital (US), University of Bath (GB), University of Brighton (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon