Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems: a comprehensive review

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems have rapidly advanced with the integration of large language models (LLMs), enabling increasingly capable reasoning, planning, tool use, and collaboration. However, the field remains fragmented by inconsistent architectural terminology, limited cross-domain comparison, and heterogeneous evaluation practices. This review addresses these gaps through a two-stage PRISMA-informed search combining Scopus with structured manual screening, covering 107 peer-reviewed original studies published between 2018 and 2026. We propose a unified five-module architecture comprising profile, memory, planning, action, and security; systematically compare agent capabilities across ten application domains; and organize evaluation practices into six dimensions: task performance, efficiency, quality, robustness, safety, and interpretability. The review identifies two recurring patterns across domains: explicit integration of domain knowledge consistently improves performance, while planner–executor–reflector role specialization appears across diverse applications. However, technical performance often exceeds validated real-world utility, with robustness, safety, and interpretability remaining particularly under-evaluated. These findings provide a common basis for understanding, comparing, and developing autonomous agents and highlight priorities for more reliable and practically deployable systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11731-2
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems: a comprehensive review

Mohammed Alaa Ala’anzy, Yassine Himeur, Meruyert Oshayeva
Artificial Intelligence Review
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems: a comprehensive review

Mohammed Alaa Ala’anzy, Yassine Himeur, Meruyert Oshayeva
article en

Abstract

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems have rapidly advanced with the integration of large language models (LLMs), enabling increasingly capable reasoning, planning, tool use, and collaboration. However, the field remains fragmented by inconsistent architectural terminology, limited cross-domain comparison, and heterogeneous evaluation practices. This review addresses these gaps through a two-stage PRISMA-informed search combining Scopus with structured manual screening, covering 107 peer-reviewed original studies published between 2018 and 2026. We propose a unified five-module architecture comprising profile, memory, planning, action, and security; systematically compare agent capabilities across ten application domains; and organize evaluation practices into six dimensions: task performance, efficiency, quality, robustness, safety, and interpretability. The review identifies two recurring patterns across domains: explicit integration of domain knowledge consistently improves performance, while planner–executor–reflector role specialization appears across diverse applications. However, technical performance often exceeds validated real-world utility, with robustness, safety, and interpretability remaining particularly under-evaluated. These findings provide a common basis for understanding, comparing, and developing autonomous agents and highlight priorities for more reliable and practically deployable systems.

Artificial Intelligence Review
University of Dubai (AE), Suleyman Demirel University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.