Effects of performing work-related secondary tasks during simulated driving: Comparison of text/voicemail and virtual meeting engagement

OBJECTIVE: Driving has a heightened risk profile in occupational contexts. Increasingly, vehicles are being viewed as an extension of the workplace, with connectivity features enabling employees to remain contactable and even participate in virtual meetings while behind the wheel. This study examined the effects of performing two different secondary tasks (engaging with text/voice messages vs. virtual conference meeting) on drivers' visual attention and vehicle control during simulated occupational driving. METHODS: Fifty-two licensed drivers completed three drives in a fixed-base driving simulator: (1) baseline drive (no secondary task); (2) reading and listening to text/voice messages; and (3) engaging in a Microsoft Teams meeting, each embedded within a simulated workplace scenario. Outcomes included visual scanning data (i.e., looks to roadway, tablet, instrument cluster), driving performance (i.e., SDLP, time headway), and subjective reporting of workload and anxiety. Data were analyzed using linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models, with exploratory moderation analyses for gender, license class, driver thrill-seeking scale (DTSS) and multi-tasking preference (MPI) scores. RESULTS: Both secondary tasks elevated subjective workload and anxiety relative to baseline, with females reporting higher workload and anxiety across all driving conditions. Visual attention to the roadway and instrument cluster were significantly reduced in both secondary tasks. However, this was more pronounced in males, provisional (P2) license holders, and drivers with higher DTSS scores during the Teams meeting task. Drivers also made more frequent and longer off-road glances, including more glances exceeding 2 s during both secondary task conditions. SDLP was significantly greater during the Teams meeting condition than both baseline and the text/voice messages condition, while time headway increased only during the text/voice messages condition, suggesting a compensatory response in car-following that was not observed during the Teams meeting drive. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related secondary tasks, even when largely passive, were associated with reduced visual attention to the roadway, increased off-road glance behavior and changes in aspects of vehicle control during simulated driving. These findings suggest that performing connectivity-based work-related secondary tasks while driving may pose risks to safe driving and warrant further investigation in representative occupational driving populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2744811
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of performing work-related secondary tasks during simulated driving: Comparison of text/voicemail and virtual meeting engagement

Blake Palmer, Darren E. Wishart, Daniel F Malone, Shelly Weaver et al.
Traffic Injury Prevention
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Effects of performing work-related secondary tasks during simulated driving: Comparison of text/voicemail and virtual meeting engagement

Blake Palmer, Darren E. Wishart, Daniel F Malone, Shelly Weaver, Matthew J. Stainer, John Seccombe, Chris Irwin
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Driving has a heightened risk profile in occupational contexts. Increasingly, vehicles are being viewed as an extension of the workplace, with connectivity features enabling employees to remain contactable and even participate in virtual meetings while behind the wheel. This study examined the effects of performing two different secondary tasks (engaging with text/voice messages vs. virtual conference meeting) on drivers' visual attention and vehicle control during simulated occupational driving. METHODS: Fifty-two licensed drivers completed three drives in a fixed-base driving simulator: (1) baseline drive (no secondary task); (2) reading and listening to text/voice messages; and (3) engaging in a Microsoft Teams meeting, each embedded within a simulated workplace scenario. Outcomes included visual scanning data (i.e., looks to roadway, tablet, instrument cluster), driving performance (i.e., SDLP, time headway), and subjective reporting of workload and anxiety. Data were analyzed using linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models, with exploratory moderation analyses for gender, license class, driver thrill-seeking scale (DTSS) and multi-tasking preference (MPI) scores. RESULTS: Both secondary tasks elevated subjective workload and anxiety relative to baseline, with females reporting higher workload and anxiety across all driving conditions. Visual attention to the roadway and instrument cluster were significantly reduced in both secondary tasks. However, this was more pronounced in males, provisional (P2) license holders, and drivers with higher DTSS scores during the Teams meeting task. Drivers also made more frequent and longer off-road glances, including more glances exceeding 2 s during both secondary task conditions. SDLP was significantly greater during the Teams meeting condition than both baseline and the text/voice messages condition, while time headway increased only during the text/voice messages condition, suggesting a compensatory response in car-following that was not observed during the Teams meeting drive. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related secondary tasks, even when largely passive, were associated with reduced visual attention to the roadway, increased off-road glance behavior and changes in aspects of vehicle control during simulated driving. These findings suggest that performing connectivity-based work-related secondary tasks while driving may pose risks to safe driving and warrant further investigation in representative occupational driving populations.

Traffic Injury Prevention
Griffith University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.