Atovaquone-proguanil chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women travelling to malaria endemic areas require effective chemoprophylaxis, with limited options including atovaquone-proguanil (AP) for which safety data remain limited. Our objective was to describe the prevalences of pregnancy outcomes and major congenital anomaly (MCA) following AP chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy. METHODS: We combined a case series from the French national Teratology Information Service (CRAT) and a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), including prospective pregnancies exposed to AP for chemoprophylaxis. Outcomes were prevalence of pregnancy outcomes and MCA. The case series included all pregnancies referred to the CRAT with an expected date of delivery between 2009-2025, and known outcome. The SRMA searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and grey literature up to 16/09/2025. Study selection and data extraction were performed using an independent dual review process. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Pooled prevalences were estimated using random-effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Our case series included 191 AP-exposed pregnancies (133 during first-trimester (T1) and 75 during second/third trimester) resulting in 85.9% livebirths (n=164), 10.0% miscarriages (n=19), 1.0% medical abortions (n=2), 1.0% stillbirth (n=2) and 2.1% elective termination (n=4). The prevalence of MCA among T1-exposed pregnancies with documented MCA status (n=110) was 3.6% (95%CI[1.0;9.0]). The SRMA included four studies, which when combined with our case series (555 AP-exposed pregnancies, 457 during T1) produced a pooled prevalence of livebirths of 80.3% (95%CI[72.3;87.2], I2=67.2%, Phet=0,047), 14.6% miscarriages (95%CI[7.3;23.9], I2=73.2%, Phet=0,024) and 2.7% for MCA (95%CI[1.2;4.8], I2=0.0%, Phet=0,45). Level of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that pregnancy outcomes and MCA following AP chemoprophylaxis exposure are similar to the general population prevalences, with a low level of evidence. These data strengthen the evidence supporting a reassuring safety profile, and AP may represent a reasonable option for pregnant women requiring malaria chemoprophylaxis after risk-benefit assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Travel Medicine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taag088
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atovaquone-proguanil chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review and meta-analysis

Agnès Dechartres, Julie Tort, Benôıt Marin, Florence Tubach et al.
Journal of Travel Medicine
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
article

Atovaquone-proguanil chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review and meta-analysis

Agnès Dechartres, Julie Tort, Benôıt Marin, Florence Tubach, Bénédicte Coulm, Élisabeth Éléfant, Jonathan L. Richardson, Isabelle Monier, Nathalie Lelong, Mathilde Latour, Delphine Beghin, Valérie Pourcher, Juliette Condé, Catherine Vauzelle
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women travelling to malaria endemic areas require effective chemoprophylaxis, with limited options including atovaquone-proguanil (AP) for which safety data remain limited. Our objective was to describe the prevalences of pregnancy outcomes and major congenital anomaly (MCA) following AP chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy. METHODS: We combined a case series from the French national Teratology Information Service (CRAT) and a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), including prospective pregnancies exposed to AP for chemoprophylaxis. Outcomes were prevalence of pregnancy outcomes and MCA. The case series included all pregnancies referred to the CRAT with an expected date of delivery between 2009-2025, and known outcome. The SRMA searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and grey literature up to 16/09/2025. Study selection and data extraction were performed using an independent dual review process. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Pooled prevalences were estimated using random-effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Our case series included 191 AP-exposed pregnancies (133 during first-trimester (T1) and 75 during second/third trimester) resulting in 85.9% livebirths (n=164), 10.0% miscarriages (n=19), 1.0% medical abortions (n=2), 1.0% stillbirth (n=2) and 2.1% elective termination (n=4). The prevalence of MCA among T1-exposed pregnancies with documented MCA status (n=110) was 3.6% (95%CI[1.0;9.0]). The SRMA included four studies, which when combined with our case series (555 AP-exposed pregnancies, 457 during T1) produced a pooled prevalence of livebirths of 80.3% (95%CI[72.3;87.2], I2=67.2%, Phet=0,047), 14.6% miscarriages (95%CI[7.3;23.9], I2=73.2%, Phet=0,024) and 2.7% for MCA (95%CI[1.2;4.8], I2=0.0%, Phet=0,45). Level of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that pregnancy outcomes and MCA following AP chemoprophylaxis exposure are similar to the general population prevalences, with a low level of evidence. These data strengthen the evidence supporting a reassuring safety profile, and AP may represent a reasonable option for pregnant women requiring malaria chemoprophylaxis after risk-benefit assessment.

Journal of Travel Medicine
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Institut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.