Perceived Respect Climate, Pressure Self-Efficacy, and Intention to Continue Refereeing: Scale Development and a Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Model

Background/Objectives: Retaining qualified referees is essential to organised sport, yet the social and psychological factors associated with referees’ intention to continue remain insufficiently understood. This study developed two referee-specific measures—the Referee Respect Climate Scale (RRC) and Referee Continuation Intention Scale (RCI)—and estimated the association between perceived respect climate and continuation intention, including the statistical indirect association through self-efficacy for performing under pressure. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was completed by 630 referees between 31 October and 25 December 2025; 625 eligible adults were analysed (67.7% men; mean age: 33.56 ± 10.35 years). The sample was split for exploratory (n = 312) and confirmatory (n = 313) factor analyses of the newly developed measures. Because Mardia’s test indicated multivariate non-normality, the three-factor measurement and structural models were estimated with robust (Satorra–Bentler) maximum likelihood and 5000-resample bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals; sensitivity analyses used ordinal WLSMV estimation, covariate adjustment and multigroup invariance testing by sex. Results: The RRC yielded a five-item unidimensional structure (α = 0.82; CR = 0.82), and the RCI a six-item unidimensional validation model (α = 0.92; CR = 0.92). The measurement model fit well (robust CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.032, SRMR = 0.034). RRC was associated with RCI (β = 0.554) and pressure self-efficacy (β = 0.276), while pressure self-efficacy was associated with RCI (β = 0.117). The indirect association was small (β = 0.032; 95% BC CI: [0.010, 0.064]); the R2 for RCI was 0.356. Ordinal, covariate-adjusted and alternative-item sensitivity analyses preserved the substantive pattern. Loading and intercept invariance across sex was supported, whereas ordinal threshold invariance was only approximate. Exploratory multigroup tests suggested a larger pressure self-efficacy path among women, although this was test-dependent. Conclusions: Perceived respect climate was strongly associated with referees’ continuation intention, whereas the indirect association through pressure self-efficacy was small. The new measures show promising initial psychometric properties, but independent and longitudinal validation is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14203476
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Respect Climate, Pressure Self-Efficacy, and Intention to Continue Refereeing: Scale Development and a Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Model

Katja Weiss, Beat Knechtle, Uğur İnce, Burak Canpolat et al.
Healthcare
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Perceived Respect Climate, Pressure Self-Efficacy, and Intention to Continue Refereeing: Scale Development and a Cross-Sectional Structural Equation Model

Katja Weiss, Beat Knechtle, Uğur İnce, Burak Canpolat, Şakir Tüfekçi, Mehmet Özkeskin, Özgür Eken, Thomas Johannes Rosemann, Fatih Harun Turhan, Sacide TÜFEKÇİ
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Retaining qualified referees is essential to organised sport, yet the social and psychological factors associated with referees’ intention to continue remain insufficiently understood. This study developed two referee-specific measures—the Referee Respect Climate Scale (RRC) and Referee Continuation Intention Scale (RCI)—and estimated the association between perceived respect climate and continuation intention, including the statistical indirect association through self-efficacy for performing under pressure. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was completed by 630 referees between 31 October and 25 December 2025; 625 eligible adults were analysed (67.7% men; mean age: 33.56 ± 10.35 years). The sample was split for exploratory (n = 312) and confirmatory (n = 313) factor analyses of the newly developed measures. Because Mardia’s test indicated multivariate non-normality, the three-factor measurement and structural models were estimated with robust (Satorra–Bentler) maximum likelihood and 5000-resample bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals; sensitivity analyses used ordinal WLSMV estimation, covariate adjustment and multigroup invariance testing by sex. Results: The RRC yielded a five-item unidimensional structure (α = 0.82; CR = 0.82), and the RCI a six-item unidimensional validation model (α = 0.92; CR = 0.92). The measurement model fit well (robust CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.032, SRMR = 0.034). RRC was associated with RCI (β = 0.554) and pressure self-efficacy (β = 0.276), while pressure self-efficacy was associated with RCI (β = 0.117). The indirect association was small (β = 0.032; 95% BC CI: [0.010, 0.064]); the R2 for RCI was 0.356. Ordinal, covariate-adjusted and alternative-item sensitivity analyses preserved the substantive pattern. Loading and intercept invariance across sex was supported, whereas ordinal threshold invariance was only approximate. Exploratory multigroup tests suggested a larger pressure self-efficacy path among women, although this was test-dependent. Conclusions: Perceived respect climate was strongly associated with referees’ continuation intention, whereas the indirect association through pressure self-efficacy was small. The new measures show promising initial psychometric properties, but independent and longitudinal validation is required.

HealthcareVol. 14(20)
Karabük University (TR), Inonu University (TR), University of Zurich (CH), Medbase (CH), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.