Together we stand: challenging the effects of international sanctions on Iran–Russia regional cooperation, 2007–2024

This article examines the evolving Iran–Russia strategic partnership within the context of prolonged sanctions, shifting regional power dynamics, and the decline of US-led unipolarity. It argues that shared pariah status and opposition to Western hegemony have fostered a pragmatic alliance spanning political, military, and economic domains, while sanctions have reshaped regional alignments and encouraged alternative connectivity initiatives such as the International North–South Transport Corridor. The study highlights a paradox: under normal market conditions, convergence between Iran and Russia would be unlikely given structural competition in energy exports and limited trade complementarities. Liberal theories of comparative advantage and interdependence predict little incentive for cooperation. Yet sanctions and international isolation created conditions in which alignment became not only possible but necessary. From 2007 to 2024, sanctions transformed a relationship marked by mistrust and asymmetry into a functional axis of resistance, challenging both the effectiveness of sanctions and the assumptions of liberal economic theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2725281
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Together we stand: challenging the effects of international sanctions on Iran–Russia regional cooperation, 2007–2024

Ronen A. Cohen, Gregory Kobzar
Cogent Social Sciences
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Together we stand: challenging the effects of international sanctions on Iran–Russia regional cooperation, 2007–2024

Ronen A. Cohen, Gregory Kobzar
article en

Abstract

This article examines the evolving Iran–Russia strategic partnership within the context of prolonged sanctions, shifting regional power dynamics, and the decline of US-led unipolarity. It argues that shared pariah status and opposition to Western hegemony have fostered a pragmatic alliance spanning political, military, and economic domains, while sanctions have reshaped regional alignments and encouraged alternative connectivity initiatives such as the International North–South Transport Corridor. The study highlights a paradox: under normal market conditions, convergence between Iran and Russia would be unlikely given structural competition in energy exports and limited trade complementarities. Liberal theories of comparative advantage and interdependence predict little incentive for cooperation. Yet sanctions and international isolation created conditions in which alignment became not only possible but necessary. From 2007 to 2024, sanctions transformed a relationship marked by mistrust and asymmetry into a functional axis of resistance, challenging both the effectiveness of sanctions and the assumptions of liberal economic theory.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 12(1)
Ariel University (IL)
Partnerships for the goals, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.