Acting in complexity: knowledge dispersion challenges in high-level teams

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical model for how high-level teams composed of capable, skilled and motivated knowledge experts can still act in ways that lead to significant failures. Design/methodology/approach Using a socio-cognitive view on the relationship between action and mind and work on social contagion, the authors explore the mechanisms that link members’ knowledge expertise, team processes and shared cognitions to team action. Findings The proposed team action identification framework provides a new perspective that brings clarity to the mechanisms through which cognitions and actions evolve at the team level by specifying how to optimally arrange knowledge expertise and team shared cognitions in contexts with high amounts of complexity and competition. Originality/value The framework extends beyond current theoretical frameworks by explaining how high-level teams that have the proper expertise, motivation and coordination for effective action may still fail to devise plans and implement needed actions when faced with complex challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2025-1467
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acting in complexity: knowledge dispersion challenges in high-level teams

Amanda Sophia Hinojosa, Alejandra Marin, Angela F. Randolph, Brandon Randolph-Seng
Journal of Knowledge Management
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Acting in complexity: knowledge dispersion challenges in high-level teams

Amanda Sophia Hinojosa, Alejandra Marin, Angela F. Randolph, Brandon Randolph-Seng
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical model for how high-level teams composed of capable, skilled and motivated knowledge experts can still act in ways that lead to significant failures. Design/methodology/approach Using a socio-cognitive view on the relationship between action and mind and work on social contagion, the authors explore the mechanisms that link members’ knowledge expertise, team processes and shared cognitions to team action. Findings The proposed team action identification framework provides a new perspective that brings clarity to the mechanisms through which cognitions and actions evolve at the team level by specifying how to optimally arrange knowledge expertise and team shared cognitions in contexts with high amounts of complexity and competition. Originality/value The framework extends beyond current theoretical frameworks by explaining how high-level teams that have the proper expertise, motivation and coordination for effective action may still fail to devise plans and implement needed actions when faced with complex challenges.

Journal of Knowledge Management
Texas Tech University (US), Howard University (US), East Texas A&M University (US), Babson College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.