Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project

Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among migrant workers and their families are important public health concerns in Nepal. The PARBARDHAN project used a community-based approach to strengthen mental health and psychosocial support, community participation, and local service capacity in migration-affected communities. This study describes psychosocial wellbeing at endline evaluation and compares findings descriptively with baseline and midline. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods endline evaluation was conducted in Salyan and Kailali districts of Nepal. The quantitative component included 245 project beneficiaries aged 16-80 yearsincluding20 (8.2%) migrant/returnee workers and 225 (91.8%) family/community respondents; 216 (88.2%) reported having a family member currently abroad. Psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and anxiety and depression the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Life satisfaction and subjective happiness were assessed. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions provided contextual information on project implementation and perceived effects. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. Data were collected from3-26 February, 2026. At endline, 34.7% screened positive for psychological distress, while 8.2% screened positive for anxiety and 5.3% for depression (5.3%). Compared with baseline and midline assessment rounds, anxiety and depression screening positivity was lower at endline, whereas probable psychological distress was higher. Qualitative findings indicated increased mental health awareness, greater willingness to seek support, perceived reductions in stigma, and support through self-help groups, peer groups counselling, and community activities. However, substantial dissatisfaction with life was also reported. Because the evaluation rounds used independent cross-sectional samples, the observed differences cannot be interpreted as within-person changes or attributed causally to the PARBARDHAN intervention. The findings indicate the perceived value of community-based mental health and psychosocial support while highlighting continuing economic insecurity, family separation, and other structural factors affecting psychosocial wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006666
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project

Aishwarya Prasad Dhakal, Himal Gaire, R Shrestha, Ganesh Bhandari et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project

Aishwarya Prasad Dhakal, Himal Gaire, R Shrestha, Ganesh Bhandari, Pashupati Mahat, Rima Mishra
article en

Abstract

Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among migrant workers and their families are important public health concerns in Nepal. The PARBARDHAN project used a community-based approach to strengthen mental health and psychosocial support, community participation, and local service capacity in migration-affected communities. This study describes psychosocial wellbeing at endline evaluation and compares findings descriptively with baseline and midline. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods endline evaluation was conducted in Salyan and Kailali districts of Nepal. The quantitative component included 245 project beneficiaries aged 16-80 yearsincluding20 (8.2%) migrant/returnee workers and 225 (91.8%) family/community respondents; 216 (88.2%) reported having a family member currently abroad. Psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and anxiety and depression the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Life satisfaction and subjective happiness were assessed. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions provided contextual information on project implementation and perceived effects. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. Data were collected from3-26 February, 2026. At endline, 34.7% screened positive for psychological distress, while 8.2% screened positive for anxiety and 5.3% for depression (5.3%). Compared with baseline and midline assessment rounds, anxiety and depression screening positivity was lower at endline, whereas probable psychological distress was higher. Qualitative findings indicated increased mental health awareness, greater willingness to seek support, perceived reductions in stigma, and support through self-help groups, peer groups counselling, and community activities. However, substantial dissatisfaction with life was also reported. Because the evaluation rounds used independent cross-sectional samples, the observed differences cannot be interpreted as within-person changes or attributed causally to the PARBARDHAN intervention. The findings indicate the perceived value of community-based mental health and psychosocial support while highlighting continuing economic insecurity, family separation, and other structural factors affecting psychosocial wellbeing.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(10)
Pokhara University (NP)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.