Equipping the next generation: addressing the unmet need for artificial intelligence education at research performing organizations

BACKGROUND: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education is rapidly accelerating, yet the educational ecosystem appears largely unprepared for the scale and speed of adoption. Our recent international survey of over 1,200 university students and postdoctoral fellows in the medical and life sciences found that while more than 80% had used GenAI tools, the vast majority had received no formal training, and many were unaware of any institutional policies governing their use. This gap between adoption and institutional preparedness may pose risks to research integrity if left unaddressed. MAIN BODY: Existing research supports a coordinated, evidence-informed approach to AI education in research performing organizations (RPOs), grounded in principles of research integrity, equity, and critical engagement with technology. First, GenAI literacy must be embedded as a core competency in scientific and clinical education, equipping students to critically evaluate tool outputs, recognize hallucination and bias, and understand the distinction between AI-generated inaccuracy and deliberate research misconduct. Second, traditional frameworks for academic integrity would benefit from re-examination. Today, GenAI tools have fundamentally disrupted established notions of authorship, originality, and plagiarism, and the absence of coherent institutional guidance leaves students and educators navigating these questions without support. Third, RPOs must develop clear, transparent, and context-sensitive policies on GenAI use by embedding responsible AI education into curricula, equipping learners not only to use these tools effectively, but to question, verify, and critique their outputs in ways that uphold scientific standards. CONCLUSION: RPOs have an urgent responsibility to move beyond reactive responses and toward proactive strategies that uphold scientific standards, promote equity of access, and prepare the next generation of researchers and clinicians to engage with GenAI responsibly and ethically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-026-00250-x
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equipping the next generation: addressing the unmet need for artificial intelligence education at research performing organizations

Jeremy Y. Ng, David Moher, Wid Al-Zahraa Al-Khafaji
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Equipping the next generation: addressing the unmet need for artificial intelligence education at research performing organizations

Jeremy Y. Ng, David Moher, Wid Al-Zahraa Al-Khafaji
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education is rapidly accelerating, yet the educational ecosystem appears largely unprepared for the scale and speed of adoption. Our recent international survey of over 1,200 university students and postdoctoral fellows in the medical and life sciences found that while more than 80% had used GenAI tools, the vast majority had received no formal training, and many were unaware of any institutional policies governing their use. This gap between adoption and institutional preparedness may pose risks to research integrity if left unaddressed. MAIN BODY: Existing research supports a coordinated, evidence-informed approach to AI education in research performing organizations (RPOs), grounded in principles of research integrity, equity, and critical engagement with technology. First, GenAI literacy must be embedded as a core competency in scientific and clinical education, equipping students to critically evaluate tool outputs, recognize hallucination and bias, and understand the distinction between AI-generated inaccuracy and deliberate research misconduct. Second, traditional frameworks for academic integrity would benefit from re-examination. Today, GenAI tools have fundamentally disrupted established notions of authorship, originality, and plagiarism, and the absence of coherent institutional guidance leaves students and educators navigating these questions without support. Third, RPOs must develop clear, transparent, and context-sensitive policies on GenAI use by embedding responsible AI education into curricula, equipping learners not only to use these tools effectively, but to question, verify, and critique their outputs in ways that uphold scientific standards. CONCLUSION: RPOs have an urgent responsibility to move beyond reactive responses and toward proactive strategies that uphold scientific standards, promote equity of access, and prepare the next generation of researchers and clinicians to engage with GenAI responsibly and ethically.

Research Integrity and Peer ReviewVol. 11(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Bosch Health Campus, University of Tübingen (DE), McMaster University (CA)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.