Anticoagulation in Mechanical Circulatory Support: Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock, advanced heart failure, and severe respiratory failure; however, anticoagulation management remains challenging due to the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, hemolysis, and device dysfunction. In this review, we synthesize contemporary evidence on anticoagulant selection, monitoring strategies, and device-specific management across major MCS platforms, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, temporary ventricular assist devices, Impella devices, and durable left ventricular assist devices. Unfractionated heparin remains the cornerstone anticoagulant across most MCS platforms, while anti-factor Xa-guided monitoring is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice in many centers alongside activated partial thromboplastin time and other monitoring modalities. Direct thrombin inhibitors represent important alternatives, particularly for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or heparin resistance. Recent advances include bicarbonate-based purge strategies for Impella support and evolving antithrombotic approaches in HeartMate 3 recipients, introduced by the ARIES-HM3 trial. Emerging investigational strategies, including direct oral anticoagulants, factor XI/XII inhibition, and precision anticoagulation approaches, show promise for improving hemocompatibility; however, current evidence remains limited, and further prospective studies are required before these strategies can be routinely adopted. Overall, contemporary evidence supports an individualized approach to anticoagulation based on device characteristics, patient-specific risk profiles, and current guideline recommendations, while highlighting important knowledge gaps that warrant further high-quality prospective investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology and Therapy
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-026-00480-6
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticoagulation in Mechanical Circulatory Support: Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Ahlam Althobaiti, Abdulmajeed M. Alshehri, Reem A Bahmaid, Mansour Alomran et al.
Cardiology and Therapy
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Anticoagulation in Mechanical Circulatory Support: Contemporary Challenges and Future Directions in Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Ahlam Althobaiti, Abdulmajeed M. Alshehri, Reem A Bahmaid, Mansour Alomran, Lama Alfehaid, Arif Albulushi
article en

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock, advanced heart failure, and severe respiratory failure; however, anticoagulation management remains challenging due to the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, hemolysis, and device dysfunction. In this review, we synthesize contemporary evidence on anticoagulant selection, monitoring strategies, and device-specific management across major MCS platforms, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, temporary ventricular assist devices, Impella devices, and durable left ventricular assist devices. Unfractionated heparin remains the cornerstone anticoagulant across most MCS platforms, while anti-factor Xa-guided monitoring is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice in many centers alongside activated partial thromboplastin time and other monitoring modalities. Direct thrombin inhibitors represent important alternatives, particularly for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or heparin resistance. Recent advances include bicarbonate-based purge strategies for Impella support and evolving antithrombotic approaches in HeartMate 3 recipients, introduced by the ARIES-HM3 trial. Emerging investigational strategies, including direct oral anticoagulants, factor XI/XII inhibition, and precision anticoagulation approaches, show promise for improving hemocompatibility; however, current evidence remains limited, and further prospective studies are required before these strategies can be routinely adopted. Overall, contemporary evidence supports an individualized approach to anticoagulation based on device characteristics, patient-specific risk profiles, and current guideline recommendations, while highlighting important knowledge gaps that warrant further high-quality prospective investigation.

Cardiology and Therapy
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Fahd Medical City (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Royal Hospital (OM), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.