Do Nonnutritive Sweeteners Alter Appetite and Food Preferences in Children? Current Evidence and Future Directions

Background/Objectives: Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) are increasingly consumed by children, but their effects on appetite regulation and food preference remain uncertain. This review evaluated whether NNS influence appetite, satiety, subsequent energy intake, sweet taste liking, preferred sweetness, or food choice in children, and how key study and developmental factors affect interpretation. Methods: This narrative review was informed by a structured PubMed search from database inception through August 2026, limited to English-language articles. Pediatric randomized and controlled studies were prioritized for direct behavioral outcomes; observational studies characterized habitual exposure and longer-term associations. Results: Direct pediatric evidence is limited and heterogeneous. Available studies do not show a consistent effect of NNS on subjective appetite or satiety. Differences in subsequent energy intake are most consistent with caloric substitution and incomplete compensation when NNS replace sugars, rather than an intrinsic appetite-suppressing effect. Pediatric studies show that NNS-sweetened products can be accepted and liked and that flavor–energy associations may influence learned liking, but they do not establish that sustained NNS exposure alters generalized preferred sweetness or habitual food choice. Anthropometric findings are indirect and depend strongly on comparator and study design. Interpretation is further influenced by sweetener type, dose, food matrix, exposure duration, and developmental stage. Conclusions: Current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent pediatric behavioral effect of NNS on appetite, preferred sweetness, or food choice. NNS may reduce sugar and energy intake when replacing sugar-sweetened products, but long-term developmental effects remain uncertain. Pediatric interventions directly measuring preferred sweetness and subsequent food choice are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18203390
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Nonnutritive Sweeteners Alter Appetite and Food Preferences in Children? Current Evidence and Future Directions

Julia Gawryjołek, Agnieszka Kowalczyk
Nutrients
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Do Nonnutritive Sweeteners Alter Appetite and Food Preferences in Children? Current Evidence and Future Directions

Julia Gawryjołek, Agnieszka Kowalczyk
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) are increasingly consumed by children, but their effects on appetite regulation and food preference remain uncertain. This review evaluated whether NNS influence appetite, satiety, subsequent energy intake, sweet taste liking, preferred sweetness, or food choice in children, and how key study and developmental factors affect interpretation. Methods: This narrative review was informed by a structured PubMed search from database inception through August 2026, limited to English-language articles. Pediatric randomized and controlled studies were prioritized for direct behavioral outcomes; observational studies characterized habitual exposure and longer-term associations. Results: Direct pediatric evidence is limited and heterogeneous. Available studies do not show a consistent effect of NNS on subjective appetite or satiety. Differences in subsequent energy intake are most consistent with caloric substitution and incomplete compensation when NNS replace sugars, rather than an intrinsic appetite-suppressing effect. Pediatric studies show that NNS-sweetened products can be accepted and liked and that flavor–energy associations may influence learned liking, but they do not establish that sustained NNS exposure alters generalized preferred sweetness or habitual food choice. Anthropometric findings are indirect and depend strongly on comparator and study design. Interpretation is further influenced by sweetener type, dose, food matrix, exposure duration, and developmental stage. Conclusions: Current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent pediatric behavioral effect of NNS on appetite, preferred sweetness, or food choice. NNS may reduce sugar and energy intake when replacing sugar-sweetened products, but long-term developmental effects remain uncertain. Pediatric interventions directly measuring preferred sweetness and subsequent food choice are needed.

NutrientsVol. 18(20)
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.