Is promoting health equity through a well-being economy a Trojan horse for a post-capitalist socialist economy? Will it make it through the public policy gates?

BackgroundAttempts to promote health equity through traditional means of public policy advocacy have proven profoundly unsuccessful in Canada. Despite decades of research, policy statements and declarations as to the importance of addressing the causes of health inequalities that prematurely sicken and kill, the quality and equitable distribution of the living and working conditions, i.e., the social determinants of health, continue to decline.PurposeIn this paper we examine the most recent attempt to promote public policy to reverse these developments - the well-being economy - that calls for "an economy designed to serve people and the planet, not the other way around" which has similarities with the coexisting concept of a post-capitalist socialist economy.AnalysisWe compare and contrast the assumptions of both approaches through a critical materialist political economy perspective lens and their likelihood of moving the health equity-promoting public policy agenda forward.FindingsWe found most of the well-being economy literature's preferred outcomes are remarkably consistent with the vision of a post-capitalist socialist economy that puts the well-being of people above profit-making. However, the means by which advocates propose these outcomes may come about are profoundly different. The omission of the terms socialist or socialism in the well-being economy literature suggests its advocates may see it as a Trojan Horse for infiltrating these concepts into public policy discourse.ConclusionWe see the well-being economy concept as another well-meaning initiative to promote health equity that is likely to be ignored by governing authorities whose interests are aligned with those for whom such an economy would conflict with their profit-making motives. Instead, we call for explicit consideration of a post-capitalist socialist economy and how it could move us towards a health equity promoting society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Health Equity Research & Policy
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535x261496407
Primary Topic
Public Health and Social Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is promoting health equity through a well-being economy a Trojan horse for a post-capitalist socialist economy? Will it make it through the public policy gates?

Toba Bryant, Dennis Raphael
Community Health Equity Research & Policy
Public Health and Social Inequalities
article

Is promoting health equity through a well-being economy a Trojan horse for a post-capitalist socialist economy? Will it make it through the public policy gates?

Toba Bryant, Dennis Raphael
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAttempts to promote health equity through traditional means of public policy advocacy have proven profoundly unsuccessful in Canada. Despite decades of research, policy statements and declarations as to the importance of addressing the causes of health inequalities that prematurely sicken and kill, the quality and equitable distribution of the living and working conditions, i.e., the social determinants of health, continue to decline.PurposeIn this paper we examine the most recent attempt to promote public policy to reverse these developments - the well-being economy - that calls for "an economy designed to serve people and the planet, not the other way around" which has similarities with the coexisting concept of a post-capitalist socialist economy.AnalysisWe compare and contrast the assumptions of both approaches through a critical materialist political economy perspective lens and their likelihood of moving the health equity-promoting public policy agenda forward.FindingsWe found most of the well-being economy literature's preferred outcomes are remarkably consistent with the vision of a post-capitalist socialist economy that puts the well-being of people above profit-making. However, the means by which advocates propose these outcomes may come about are profoundly different. The omission of the terms socialist or socialism in the well-being economy literature suggests its advocates may see it as a Trojan Horse for infiltrating these concepts into public policy discourse.ConclusionWe see the well-being economy concept as another well-meaning initiative to promote health equity that is likely to be ignored by governing authorities whose interests are aligned with those for whom such an economy would conflict with their profit-making motives. Instead, we call for explicit consideration of a post-capitalist socialist economy and how it could move us towards a health equity promoting society.

Community Health Equity Research & Policy
York University (CA), Ontario Tech University (CA)
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Public Health and Social Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.