Knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Pakistan

Globally, euthanasia is a strongly debated and ethically complex issue, with views shaped by cultural, religious, and moral precepts. In conservative cultures like Pakistan, euthanasia discussions are sensitive and occasionally ignored. This study aims to evaluate medical professionals' and students' knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance of euthanasia in Pakistan. From May 16 to June 16, 2025, a cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 10 Pakistani medical institutions. The study utilized convenience sampling to select MBBS first- and final-year students and practicing doctors with a minimum of 1 year of clinical experience. Outcomes were assessed using a modified Attitudes Toward Euthanasia scale and structured knowledge items to evaluate knowledge of euthanasia, attitudes toward it, and the acceptability of its legalization. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics, while one-way analysis of variance and independent-samples t tests were used to assess differences in mean attitude ratings across demographic categories. Chi-square tests analyzed relationships between categorical factors and euthanasia approval, and Spearman rank correlation examined connections between attitude ratings and continuous variables such as age and clinical experience. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. A study involving 506 participants, including first-year and final-year medical students and practicing physicians, found that only 40.1% favored euthanasia. Knowledge and attitude scores averaged 66.4 ± 10.8 and 8.7 ± 2.1, respectively, with a positive correlation between them (ρ = 0.44, P < .01). Practicing physicians showed significantly higher acceptance than students, particularly those with lower religiosity (P < .05). Acceptance of euthanasia is related significantly to religion and religiosity, with non-Muslims and less religious participants more likely to accept it. Gender, occupation, religion, province, and religiosity were independent predictors of attitude scores, while religion and religiosity were the strongest predictors of approval in logistic regression. Pakistani medical students and doctors possess limited knowledge and varied attitudes toward euthanasia, significantly influenced by professional experience, level of training, and religious beliefs. Misconceptions about the legal and ethical aspects emphasize the need for integrating structured bioethics and end-of-life care education in medical training. Targeted educational initiatives can enhance ethically informed decision-making among healthcare professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051123
Primary Topic
Palliative and Oncologic Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Pakistan

Zoha Khan, Farman Ullah Khan, Fatima Mufti, Ihsan Qamar et al.
Medicine
Palliative and Oncologic Care
article

Knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Pakistan

Zoha Khan, Farman Ullah Khan, Fatima Mufti, Ihsan Qamar, Alina Jamshed, Abdullah Imtiaz, Ubaid Ur Rehman, Ayesha Farrukh, Waseem Sajjad, Humaira Farooqi, Mohammad Zahir, Danish Azeem, Shayan Nawaz, Abarna Nayyar, Ali Raza, Abdul Aleem, Alaa Abdel-Akher
article en

Abstract

Globally, euthanasia is a strongly debated and ethically complex issue, with views shaped by cultural, religious, and moral precepts. In conservative cultures like Pakistan, euthanasia discussions are sensitive and occasionally ignored. This study aims to evaluate medical professionals' and students' knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance of euthanasia in Pakistan. From May 16 to June 16, 2025, a cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 10 Pakistani medical institutions. The study utilized convenience sampling to select MBBS first- and final-year students and practicing doctors with a minimum of 1 year of clinical experience. Outcomes were assessed using a modified Attitudes Toward Euthanasia scale and structured knowledge items to evaluate knowledge of euthanasia, attitudes toward it, and the acceptability of its legalization. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics, while one-way analysis of variance and independent-samples t tests were used to assess differences in mean attitude ratings across demographic categories. Chi-square tests analyzed relationships between categorical factors and euthanasia approval, and Spearman rank correlation examined connections between attitude ratings and continuous variables such as age and clinical experience. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. A study involving 506 participants, including first-year and final-year medical students and practicing physicians, found that only 40.1% favored euthanasia. Knowledge and attitude scores averaged 66.4 ± 10.8 and 8.7 ± 2.1, respectively, with a positive correlation between them (ρ = 0.44, P < .01). Practicing physicians showed significantly higher acceptance than students, particularly those with lower religiosity (P < .05). Acceptance of euthanasia is related significantly to religion and religiosity, with non-Muslims and less religious participants more likely to accept it. Gender, occupation, religion, province, and religiosity were independent predictors of attitude scores, while religion and religiosity were the strongest predictors of approval in logistic regression. Pakistani medical students and doctors possess limited knowledge and varied attitudes toward euthanasia, significantly influenced by professional experience, level of training, and religious beliefs. Misconceptions about the legal and ethical aspects emphasize the need for integrating structured bioethics and end-of-life care education in medical training. Targeted educational initiatives can enhance ethically informed decision-making among healthcare professionals.

MedicineVol. 105(42)
Ayub Medical College (PK), King Edward Medical University (PK), Cairo University (EG), Rawalpindi Medical University (PK), Rashid Latif Medical College (PK), Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (PK), Mayo Hospital (PK), Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College (BD), National University of Medical Sciences (PK), Spinghar Institute of Higher Education, Kabul (AF), CMH Multan Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), POF Hospital (PK), East West University (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative and Oncologic Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.