A Decade of QOPI in Spain: From Quality Measurement to Continuous Improvement in Oncology Practice

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated 10 years of QOPI implementation in Spain to characterize quality performance across successive stages of participation, assess sustainability over time, compare performance with contemporaneous QOPI benchmarks, identify persistent certification gaps, and examine quality performance across repeated certification and reassessment cycles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a longitudinal descriptive study of QOPI implementation in Spanish oncology practices between 2015 and 2025. Analyses included within-practice changes in QOPI quality measures among certified practices, comparing the last available pre-certification assessment with the first post-certification assessment, including disease-specific measures for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer; descriptive comparisons between first participation and post-certification assessments, benchmarking against the contemporaneous QOPI Aggregate, and findings from external certification and recertification surveys. RESULTS: Within-practice longitudinal analyses among certified practices showed higher post-certification performance in several patient-centered measures, including emotional well-being assessment (75.56% to 85.20%), infertility risk discussion (70.33% to 78.67%), appropriate pain management (83.57% to 89.15%), and pain assessment (83.56% to 89.50%). Certified practices maintained broadly high performance over time, although lower post-certification performance was observed in some chemotherapy and other documentation measures. Benchmarking showed a shift: pain assessment, emotional well-being assessment, appropriate pain management, and infertility counseling moved from below to above the contemporaneous QOPI Aggregate after certification. External surveys identified recurrent opportunities for improvement in treatment verification and patient information and education. CONCLUSION: A decade of QOPI implementation in Spain was associated with sustained high-quality performance, higher scores in selected patient-centered measures after certification, and the identification of persistent opportunities for improvement. Repeated measurement, benchmarking, certification, and reassessment may support organizational change and continuous quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-26-01123
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Decade of QOPI in Spain: From Quality Measurement to Continuous Improvement in Oncology Practice

Ana Blasco, Paula Gratal, Luis de la Cruz‐Merino, Jesús García‐Foncillas et al.
JCO Oncology Practice
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

A Decade of QOPI in Spain: From Quality Measurement to Continuous Improvement in Oncology Practice

Ana Blasco, Paula Gratal, Luis de la Cruz‐Merino, Jesús García‐Foncillas, Carlos Burriel, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Álvaro Rogado, Pilar García‐Alfonso, Pedro Pérez Segura, Francisco Javier Jiménez, Marta Alba, Rafael Lopez, Sandra Chamochin
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated 10 years of QOPI implementation in Spain to characterize quality performance across successive stages of participation, assess sustainability over time, compare performance with contemporaneous QOPI benchmarks, identify persistent certification gaps, and examine quality performance across repeated certification and reassessment cycles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a longitudinal descriptive study of QOPI implementation in Spanish oncology practices between 2015 and 2025. Analyses included within-practice changes in QOPI quality measures among certified practices, comparing the last available pre-certification assessment with the first post-certification assessment, including disease-specific measures for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer; descriptive comparisons between first participation and post-certification assessments, benchmarking against the contemporaneous QOPI Aggregate, and findings from external certification and recertification surveys. RESULTS: Within-practice longitudinal analyses among certified practices showed higher post-certification performance in several patient-centered measures, including emotional well-being assessment (75.56% to 85.20%), infertility risk discussion (70.33% to 78.67%), appropriate pain management (83.57% to 89.15%), and pain assessment (83.56% to 89.50%). Certified practices maintained broadly high performance over time, although lower post-certification performance was observed in some chemotherapy and other documentation measures. Benchmarking showed a shift: pain assessment, emotional well-being assessment, appropriate pain management, and infertility counseling moved from below to above the contemporaneous QOPI Aggregate after certification. External surveys identified recurrent opportunities for improvement in treatment verification and patient information and education. CONCLUSION: A decade of QOPI implementation in Spain was associated with sustained high-quality performance, higher scores in selected patient-centered measures after certification, and the identification of persistent opportunities for improvement. Repeated measurement, benchmarking, certification, and reassessment may support organizational change and continuous quality improvement.

JCO Oncology Practice
Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón (ES), Fundación para el Desarrollo de la Ecología (BO), Hospital General Mateu Orfila (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES), Fundacion Centro De Investigacion De Enfermedades Neurologicas (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.