Effects of Training Data Source on PINN Modeling of Laser-Induced Heat Diffusion in Human Skin

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as an effective surrogate to classical numerical methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in a wide range of physical systems. When augmented with supervised data, PINN performance can depend strongly on the quality and characteristics of the training data; however, the influence of the numerical method used to generate that data remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate how training data generated by finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) solvers affects PINN training and predictive accuracy, particularly in solving the one-dimensional heat equation under conditions relevant to laser–tissue interactions. A supervised data loss term is incorporated, and models trained on FDM- and FEM-generated temperature fields under identical physical conditions are compared to assess differences in convergence and accuracy. The results demonstrate that, under controlled one-dimensional diffusion settings, the numerical solver used for data generation produces a quantifiable, resolution-dependent effect on hybrid PINN performance: FDM-generated training data yields the lowest error across most tested resolutions, an advantage that narrows and becomes indistinguishable only at the finest resolution considered, providing practical guidance for selecting a data-generating solver in biological heat transfer applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19100887
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Training Data Source on PINN Modeling of Laser-Induced Heat Diffusion in Human Skin

Taufiquar R. Khan, J. Quinn, Chad A. Oian, Cam Peters et al.
Algorithms
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Effects of Training Data Source on PINN Modeling of Laser-Induced Heat Diffusion in Human Skin

Taufiquar R. Khan, J. Quinn, Chad A. Oian, Cam Peters, Steve Wainaina, Hunter Young
article en

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as an effective surrogate to classical numerical methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in a wide range of physical systems. When augmented with supervised data, PINN performance can depend strongly on the quality and characteristics of the training data; however, the influence of the numerical method used to generate that data remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate how training data generated by finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM) solvers affects PINN training and predictive accuracy, particularly in solving the one-dimensional heat equation under conditions relevant to laser–tissue interactions. A supervised data loss term is incorporated, and models trained on FDM- and FEM-generated temperature fields under identical physical conditions are compared to assess differences in convergence and accuracy. The results demonstrate that, under controlled one-dimensional diffusion settings, the numerical solver used for data generation produces a quantifiable, resolution-dependent effect on hybrid PINN performance: FDM-generated training data yields the lowest error across most tested resolutions, an advantage that narrows and becomes indistinguishable only at the finest resolution considered, providing practical guidance for selecting a data-generating solver in biological heat transfer applications.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(10)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), 59th Medical Wing (US)
Air Force Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.