Development and Psychometric Validation of the Geriatric Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire for Intensive Care Nurses

Background: Critically ill geriatric patients represent a unique group with specific care needs due to the physiological and pathological changes associated with aging, which make them susceptible to adverse events and complications during their stay in the Intensive Care Units. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Geriatric Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (GPSC-Q), which assesses ICU nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, self-reported practices, and perceptions of the work environment related to the safety of critically ill geriatric patients. Method: A methodological study was conducted among 330 ICU nurses to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the multidimensional GPSC-Q. The psychometric evaluation included content validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity assessments. Results: The final questionnaire comprised 43 items: 15 Knowledge, 7 Attitude, 12 Practice, and 9 Work Environment items. Exploratory factor analysis identified four, one, four, and three factors, respectively. Internal consistency coefficients were 0.902, 0.936, 0.749, and 0.721, respectively. Knowledge and Practice showed satisfactory primary CFA fit, whereas Attitude showed mixed fit, including an elevated RMSEA of 0.083. Work Environment showed weaker fit (CFI = 0.907, TLI = 0.855, RMSEA = 0.089) and lower reliability and convergent validity in two domains. The second-order CFA showed mixed fit (CFI = 0.936, TLI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.070), with CFI and TLI below the prespecified criteria. Conclusions: The GPSC-Q provides preliminary psychometric support for assessing ICU nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, self-reported practices, and perceptions of the work environment related to geriatric patient safety. However, support varied across subscales, with weaker findings for Work Environment. Further refinement and validation in independent samples are needed before recommending broad application. Implications for Practice: The GPSC-Q provides a structured approach to assessing nursing and work environment dimensions relevant to geriatric patient safety in intensive care. Further validation may support its use in identifying educational priorities and informing organizational safety initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14203473
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Geriatric Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire for Intensive Care Nurses

Mohamed E. H. Elzeky, Noha F. M. Shahine, Mazen Baazeem, Haitham Mokhtar Mohamed Abdallah et al.
Healthcare
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Geriatric Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire for Intensive Care Nurses

Mohamed E. H. Elzeky, Noha F. M. Shahine, Mazen Baazeem, Haitham Mokhtar Mohamed Abdallah, Wafa Hamad Almegewly, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Heba Ahmed Mohsen Hassen, Abeer Abd El-Rahman Mohamed, Eman Mahmoud Mohammed Shoukr
article en

Abstract

Background: Critically ill geriatric patients represent a unique group with specific care needs due to the physiological and pathological changes associated with aging, which make them susceptible to adverse events and complications during their stay in the Intensive Care Units. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Geriatric Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (GPSC-Q), which assesses ICU nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, self-reported practices, and perceptions of the work environment related to the safety of critically ill geriatric patients. Method: A methodological study was conducted among 330 ICU nurses to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the multidimensional GPSC-Q. The psychometric evaluation included content validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity assessments. Results: The final questionnaire comprised 43 items: 15 Knowledge, 7 Attitude, 12 Practice, and 9 Work Environment items. Exploratory factor analysis identified four, one, four, and three factors, respectively. Internal consistency coefficients were 0.902, 0.936, 0.749, and 0.721, respectively. Knowledge and Practice showed satisfactory primary CFA fit, whereas Attitude showed mixed fit, including an elevated RMSEA of 0.083. Work Environment showed weaker fit (CFI = 0.907, TLI = 0.855, RMSEA = 0.089) and lower reliability and convergent validity in two domains. The second-order CFA showed mixed fit (CFI = 0.936, TLI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.070), with CFI and TLI below the prespecified criteria. Conclusions: The GPSC-Q provides preliminary psychometric support for assessing ICU nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, self-reported practices, and perceptions of the work environment related to geriatric patient safety. However, support varied across subscales, with weaker findings for Work Environment. Further refinement and validation in independent samples are needed before recommending broad application. Implications for Practice: The GPSC-Q provides a structured approach to assessing nursing and work environment dimensions relevant to geriatric patient safety in intensive care. Further validation may support its use in identifying educational priorities and informing organizational safety initiatives.

HealthcareVol. 14(20)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Mansoura University (EG), Jouf University (SA), University of Hafr Al-Batin (SA), Alexandria University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.