Comparing knowledge about and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic testing over a 20-year period in a representative sample in Germany

Abstract Background Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is a technique allowing genetic testing of embryos before implantation. In the 2000s a lack of knowledge about and highly ambivalent emotions towards PGT have been reported in Germany. In 2011, regulations changed, legalizing the procedure under certain preconditions. Methods A cross-sectional trend-design with population-representative data, collected in 2003 ( n = 2110) and 2024 ( n = 2504), was applied. Analyses included χ 2 test and t-tests comparing knowledge and attitudes in 2003 and 2024. Binary logistic regression and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to explore differences. Results Mild differences in subjective prior knowledge between the two samples became evident. Sociodemographic factors (gender, education, and relationship status) were modestly associated with higher prior knowledge. Positive attitudes were slightly higher, and negative attitudes slightly lower, in 2024. In 2003 small differences for gender and religious affiliation became evident. Subjective prior knowledge had the relatively strongest association with agreement to all benefit-related-items, and more positive attitude towards PGT in 2024. In 2024 one fourth of participants answered “I don’t know”, regarding their agreement to statements about PGT. Conclusions Findings emphasize the ongoing debate and uncertainty surrounding PGT. Results may indicate slow social changes in attitudes towards genetic research and application, and also in regards to awareness of reproductive autonomy and gender biases. These results underscore the need for sufficient public education and point out the delicate issue of balancing medical advancements with ethical and social responsibility. Trial registration Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4PF5N )

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-03155-8
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing knowledge about and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic testing over a 20-year period in a representative sample in Germany

Beate Ditzen, T. Strowitzki, Ariane Germeyer, Julia Mahal et al.
Discover Public Health
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Comparing knowledge about and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic testing over a 20-year period in a representative sample in Germany

Beate Ditzen, T. Strowitzki, Ariane Germeyer, Julia Mahal, Elmar Brähler, Elena Sophia Doll, Charlotte Raithel, Panna Darazs
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is a technique allowing genetic testing of embryos before implantation. In the 2000s a lack of knowledge about and highly ambivalent emotions towards PGT have been reported in Germany. In 2011, regulations changed, legalizing the procedure under certain preconditions. Methods A cross-sectional trend-design with population-representative data, collected in 2003 ( n = 2110) and 2024 ( n = 2504), was applied. Analyses included χ 2 test and t-tests comparing knowledge and attitudes in 2003 and 2024. Binary logistic regression and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to explore differences. Results Mild differences in subjective prior knowledge between the two samples became evident. Sociodemographic factors (gender, education, and relationship status) were modestly associated with higher prior knowledge. Positive attitudes were slightly higher, and negative attitudes slightly lower, in 2024. In 2003 small differences for gender and religious affiliation became evident. Subjective prior knowledge had the relatively strongest association with agreement to all benefit-related-items, and more positive attitude towards PGT in 2024. In 2024 one fourth of participants answered “I don’t know”, regarding their agreement to statements about PGT. Conclusions Findings emphasize the ongoing debate and uncertainty surrounding PGT. Results may indicate slow social changes in attitudes towards genetic research and application, and also in regards to awareness of reproductive autonomy and gender biases. These results underscore the need for sufficient public education and point out the delicate issue of balancing medical advancements with ethical and social responsibility. Trial registration Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4PF5N )

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Frauenklinik Heidelberg (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.