Definition of childhood visual impairment: A systematic overview of reviews and authoritative sources across clinical, research, and policy contexts

AIMS: To identify, synthesize, and compare current terminologies and definitions of cerebral visual impairment (CVI) in children across clinical, research, educational, and policy settings. METHOD: We conducted a systematic overview of systematic reviews and authoritative documents registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251025233) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Health and Medical, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for records published from 1st January 2015 to 10th April 2025, without language restrictions. Records were screened independently by pairs of reviewers. We performed manual searches of websites from governmental organizations, national health authorities, CVI societies, and international professional bodies. RESULTS: Forty-eight systematic reviews and 26 authoritative documents were included. CVI was most commonly defined using World Health Organization-based or International Classification of Diseases-based distance visual acuity thresholds, typically defining visual impairment as a visual acuity worse than 6/12 in the better-seeing eye and blindness as visual acuity worse than 3/60. Visual field loss and near visual impairment were incorporated less consistently. Systematic reviews tended to prioritize measurable criteria, typically visual acuity in the better-seeing eye, whereas authoritative documents more frequently linked visual impairment to functional consequences for learning and daily activities. CVI was described in a subset of sources as brain-based visual dysfunction not fully explained by ocular pathology, but definitions and severity criteria varied widely. Few documents included structured functional vision assessment. INTERPRETATION: CVI definitions remain heterogeneous and incompletely reflect real-world visual functioning, especially for CVI and functional vision. Consensus is needed on child-centred, multidimensional definitions integrating ocular and brain-based causes, multiple visual functions, and functional impact across sectors. A working definition of CVI is needed and has been proposed in this review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70519
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definition of childhood visual impairment: A systematic overview of reviews and authoritative sources across clinical, research, and policy contexts

María Luisa Scattoni, Martina Micai, Letizia Gila, Angela Caruso et al.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Definition of childhood visual impairment: A systematic overview of reviews and authoritative sources across clinical, research, and policy contexts

María Luisa Scattoni, Martina Micai, Letizia Gila, Angela Caruso, Mara Sabbioni, Els Ortibus, Francesca Fulceri, Elisa Maria Fazzi, Corinna Bauer, John Ravencroft
article en

Abstract

AIMS: To identify, synthesize, and compare current terminologies and definitions of cerebral visual impairment (CVI) in children across clinical, research, educational, and policy settings. METHOD: We conducted a systematic overview of systematic reviews and authoritative documents registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251025233) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Health and Medical, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for records published from 1st January 2015 to 10th April 2025, without language restrictions. Records were screened independently by pairs of reviewers. We performed manual searches of websites from governmental organizations, national health authorities, CVI societies, and international professional bodies. RESULTS: Forty-eight systematic reviews and 26 authoritative documents were included. CVI was most commonly defined using World Health Organization-based or International Classification of Diseases-based distance visual acuity thresholds, typically defining visual impairment as a visual acuity worse than 6/12 in the better-seeing eye and blindness as visual acuity worse than 3/60. Visual field loss and near visual impairment were incorporated less consistently. Systematic reviews tended to prioritize measurable criteria, typically visual acuity in the better-seeing eye, whereas authoritative documents more frequently linked visual impairment to functional consequences for learning and daily activities. CVI was described in a subset of sources as brain-based visual dysfunction not fully explained by ocular pathology, but definitions and severity criteria varied widely. Few documents included structured functional vision assessment. INTERPRETATION: CVI definitions remain heterogeneous and incompletely reflect real-world visual functioning, especially for CVI and functional vision. Consensus is needed on child-centred, multidimensional definitions integrating ocular and brain-based causes, multiple visual functions, and functional impact across sectors. A working definition of CVI is needed and has been proposed in this review.

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), University of Brescia (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.