Economic sanctions’ ‘blind spot’: the power of internalized markets of MNEs

Abstract Governments increasingly use economic sanctions to enforce foreign policy goals. While such measures are intended to weaken the target country’s economy by restricting cross-border market transactions, sanctions have only a limited effect on the divestment of foreign subsidiaries in target countries. In this study, we argue that MNEs gain strategic flexibility through internalizing markets for goods and capital and can use this flexibility to cope with sanctions against host countries. Internalized markets allow them to reroute commercial and financial transactions with subsidiaries in sanctioned countries through their global subsidiary network in a legal way and, thus, maintain FDI activities in sanctioned countries. Using data on subsidiaries of Austrian MNEs in countries of the former Warsaw Pact, we find that sanctions do increase the likelihood of subsidiary divestment. However, for MNEs that maintain subsidiaries in countries that are commercial allies of the sanctioned country or that serve as offshore financial centers, this likelihood is significantly reduced. We discuss policy implications of MNEs’ use of internalized markets for rerouting cross-border transactions through third countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Business Policy
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-026-00261-x
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic sanctions’ ‘blind spot’: the power of internalized markets of MNEs

Jan Hendrik Fisch, Igor V. Filatotchev, Bjoern Schmeisser, Jelena Graneros
Journal of International Business Policy
International Business and FDI
article

Economic sanctions’ ‘blind spot’: the power of internalized markets of MNEs

Jan Hendrik Fisch, Igor V. Filatotchev, Bjoern Schmeisser, Jelena Graneros
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments increasingly use economic sanctions to enforce foreign policy goals. While such measures are intended to weaken the target country’s economy by restricting cross-border market transactions, sanctions have only a limited effect on the divestment of foreign subsidiaries in target countries. In this study, we argue that MNEs gain strategic flexibility through internalizing markets for goods and capital and can use this flexibility to cope with sanctions against host countries. Internalized markets allow them to reroute commercial and financial transactions with subsidiaries in sanctioned countries through their global subsidiary network in a legal way and, thus, maintain FDI activities in sanctioned countries. Using data on subsidiaries of Austrian MNEs in countries of the former Warsaw Pact, we find that sanctions do increase the likelihood of subsidiary divestment. However, for MNEs that maintain subsidiaries in countries that are commercial allies of the sanctioned country or that serve as offshore financial centers, this likelihood is significantly reduced. We discuss policy implications of MNEs’ use of internalized markets for rerouting cross-border transactions through third countries.

Journal of International Business Policy
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), King's College London (GB), James Cook University (AU), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.