“ This data is really sensitive ” – the making of non-commercial menstruapps as productive resistance within Femtech

Digital menstrual cycle tracking is a booming business and a burgeoning field of study. Although often framed as empowering, researchers have recognized serious problems in menstrual cycle tracking apps, or “menstruapps.” These include the lack of accuracy in predictions, the enforcement of harmful stereotypes, and above all, the ways in which sensitive user data is collected and used for profit-making. However, in recent years, a number of non-commercial apps have become available. In this study, nine makers of non-commercial menstruapps were interviewed. Through analyzing their goals and motivations, making non-commercial menstruapps is shown to function as a form of productive resistance within the female technology or “Femtech” sector. Setting themselves in opposition to commercialized Femtech, the makers aim for solutions that enhance self-understanding through the use of data technologies while ensuring privacy, considering human individuality, and enhancing transparency and inclusion. The article discusses the potential and limits of challenging Femtech from within.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feminist Media Studies
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2026.2745932
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“ This data is really sensitive ” – the making of non-commercial menstruapps as productive resistance within Femtech

Aino Koskenniemi
Feminist Media Studies
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

“ This data is really sensitive ” – the making of non-commercial menstruapps as productive resistance within Femtech

Aino Koskenniemi
article en

Abstract

Digital menstrual cycle tracking is a booming business and a burgeoning field of study. Although often framed as empowering, researchers have recognized serious problems in menstrual cycle tracking apps, or “menstruapps.” These include the lack of accuracy in predictions, the enforcement of harmful stereotypes, and above all, the ways in which sensitive user data is collected and used for profit-making. However, in recent years, a number of non-commercial apps have become available. In this study, nine makers of non-commercial menstruapps were interviewed. Through analyzing their goals and motivations, making non-commercial menstruapps is shown to function as a form of productive resistance within the female technology or “Femtech” sector. Setting themselves in opposition to commercialized Femtech, the makers aim for solutions that enhance self-understanding through the use of data technologies while ensuring privacy, considering human individuality, and enhancing transparency and inclusion. The article discusses the potential and limits of challenging Femtech from within.

Feminist Media Studies
University of Turku (FI)
Strategic Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.