Mineral carbonation for low-carbon foam-based construction materials - a review

Foam concrete is a widely used construction material due to its lightweight nature and good thermal and acoustic insulation performance, achieved through the incorporation of foaming agents in a cement-based matrix. However, like most construction materials, foam concrete is currently under significant pressure to reduce its carbon footprint by lowering its reliance on Portland cement. Mineral carbonation is a fast-growing technology to support low-carbon construction materials development. The present literature review analyses the extent to which mineral carbonation can be used for producing and hardening foams. The principles of mineral carbonation in relation to potential precursors and requirements for mineral foams are discussed, including the compatibility with foaming technologies. The discussion on the foaming process includes foam production, casting, and carbonation curing steps necessary to shape and harden lightweight construction products. The microstructure development relates to the material performance (mechanical, thermal, durability, acoustic) and CO 2 uptake potential. The reviewed literature shows that carbonation can increase both CO 2 uptake and mechanical performances, although the effects depend strongly on precursor composition, density, pore structure, and curing conditions. Reported CO 2 uptake ranges from approximately 6.1–8.6 wt% in Portland-cement-based CO 2 foam concrete to up to 28 wt% in slag-based carbonated autoclaved aerated concrete, while strength increases of approximately 35% have been reported. However, CO 2 uptake is not governed by porosity alone and also depends on the availability and reactivity of carbonatable phases and CO 2 transport. This review highlights that many aspects remain unresolved in terms of material design, production, performance assessment, and adaptations needed for extensive industrial adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Materials
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-026-01014-6
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mineral carbonation for low-carbon foam-based construction materials - a review

Mustafa Cem Usta, Ruben Snellings, Antonino Runci, Mieke Quaghebeur et al.
Discover Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Mineral carbonation for low-carbon foam-based construction materials - a review

Mustafa Cem Usta, Ruben Snellings, Antonino Runci, Mieke Quaghebeur, Peter Nielsen, Hadi Kazemi Kamyab, Yury Villagran-Zaccardi
article en

Abstract

Foam concrete is a widely used construction material due to its lightweight nature and good thermal and acoustic insulation performance, achieved through the incorporation of foaming agents in a cement-based matrix. However, like most construction materials, foam concrete is currently under significant pressure to reduce its carbon footprint by lowering its reliance on Portland cement. Mineral carbonation is a fast-growing technology to support low-carbon construction materials development. The present literature review analyses the extent to which mineral carbonation can be used for producing and hardening foams. The principles of mineral carbonation in relation to potential precursors and requirements for mineral foams are discussed, including the compatibility with foaming technologies. The discussion on the foaming process includes foam production, casting, and carbonation curing steps necessary to shape and harden lightweight construction products. The microstructure development relates to the material performance (mechanical, thermal, durability, acoustic) and CO 2 uptake potential. The reviewed literature shows that carbonation can increase both CO 2 uptake and mechanical performances, although the effects depend strongly on precursor composition, density, pore structure, and curing conditions. Reported CO 2 uptake ranges from approximately 6.1–8.6 wt% in Portland-cement-based CO 2 foam concrete to up to 28 wt% in slag-based carbonated autoclaved aerated concrete, while strength increases of approximately 35% have been reported. However, CO 2 uptake is not governed by porosity alone and also depends on the availability and reactivity of carbonatable phases and CO 2 transport. This review highlights that many aspects remain unresolved in terms of material design, production, performance assessment, and adaptations needed for extensive industrial adoption.

Discover Materials
Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
Responsible consumption and production, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.