Evaluation of respiratory motion robustness of expanded-field VMAT in breast radiotherapy using dynamic phantom film dosimetry

Respiratory motion can displace the superficial breast target into the beam penumbra or beyond the planned multileaf collimator aperture, causing target-edge underdosing. Expanded-field volumetric modulated arc therapy (E-VMAT) creates a superficial and tangential aperture reserve, but its performance during continuous motion has not been directly evaluated using radiochromic film dosimetry. This study evaluated whether E-VMAT reduces motion-related underdosing at the superficial anterior edge of the planning target volume in breast radiotherapy. Hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT), non-expanded VMAT (N-VMAT), and E-VMAT plans were generated using identical target contours, prescriptions, and primary optimization objectives. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom with a patient-specific 3D-printed breast attachment was mounted on an in-house three-dimensional motion platform and irradiated under three predefined anteroposterior surface-normal motion conditions. Each plan-motion combination was measured in triplicate at five film planes. Dose degradation was assessed using 3%/3 mm gamma loss, A95 loss, Cold95 area, 95% isodose retreat-equivalent distance, mean-dose retention, and a descriptive protection index. Under moderate and extreme motion, N-VMAT gamma loss was 24.6% ± 10.2% and 53.9% ± 14.6%, while A95 loss was 33.1% ± 24.4% and 73.7% ± 31.3%, respectively. E-VMAT maintained gamma loss at ≤9.3% and A95 loss at ≤11.9% across all conditions. Relative to N-VMAT, E-VMAT reduced A95 loss by 83.8%–86.0% and gamma loss by 82.7%–95.7% under moderate and extreme motion. E-VMAT reduced but did not eliminate respiratory motion-induced superficial target-edge dose degradation. Patient-specific volumetric four-dimensional validation remains necessary before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102758
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of respiratory motion robustness of expanded-field VMAT in breast radiotherapy using dynamic phantom film dosimetry

Xin Huang, C. L. Guo, Ying Cao, Kuo Men et al.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Evaluation of respiratory motion robustness of expanded-field VMAT in breast radiotherapy using dynamic phantom film dosimetry

Xin Huang, C. L. Guo, Ying Cao, Kuo Men, Ke Zhang, Kaixuan Zhang, Wenjie Yan, Jianrong Dai
article en

Abstract

Respiratory motion can displace the superficial breast target into the beam penumbra or beyond the planned multileaf collimator aperture, causing target-edge underdosing. Expanded-field volumetric modulated arc therapy (E-VMAT) creates a superficial and tangential aperture reserve, but its performance during continuous motion has not been directly evaluated using radiochromic film dosimetry. This study evaluated whether E-VMAT reduces motion-related underdosing at the superficial anterior edge of the planning target volume in breast radiotherapy. Hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT), non-expanded VMAT (N-VMAT), and E-VMAT plans were generated using identical target contours, prescriptions, and primary optimization objectives. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom with a patient-specific 3D-printed breast attachment was mounted on an in-house three-dimensional motion platform and irradiated under three predefined anteroposterior surface-normal motion conditions. Each plan-motion combination was measured in triplicate at five film planes. Dose degradation was assessed using 3%/3 mm gamma loss, A95 loss, Cold95 area, 95% isodose retreat-equivalent distance, mean-dose retention, and a descriptive protection index. Under moderate and extreme motion, N-VMAT gamma loss was 24.6% ± 10.2% and 53.9% ± 14.6%, while A95 loss was 33.1% ± 24.4% and 73.7% ± 31.3%, respectively. E-VMAT maintained gamma loss at ≤9.3% and A95 loss at ≤11.9% across all conditions. Relative to N-VMAT, E-VMAT reduced A95 loss by 83.8%–86.0% and gamma loss by 82.7%–95.7% under moderate and extreme motion. E-VMAT reduced but did not eliminate respiratory motion-induced superficial target-edge dose degradation. Patient-specific volumetric four-dimensional validation remains necessary before clinical implementation.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 19(4)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Nankai University (CN), Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.