AI‐Supported Research‐Led Teaching in Syntegrative Project‐Based Learning: Educator Questioning, Feedback, and Student Learning Outcomes in Authentic Industry Projects

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is creating new possibilities for connecting research‐led teaching with authentic industry projects, yet its educational value depends on how educators organize inquiry rather than on technological use alone. This study examined the relationships among AI‐supported research‐led teaching (AIRLT), educator questioning (EQ), educator feedback (EF), student inquiry engagement (SIE), and authentic project learning outcomes (APLO) within Syntegrative Project‐Based Learning. A quantitative cross‐sectional survey was conducted with 898 undergraduate students from 12 universities in Vietnam who had participated in authentic industry or organizational projects involving AI‐supported inquiry and educator guidance. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) showed that AIRLT was positively associated with EQ ( β = 0.642) and EF ( β = 0.611). Both EQ ( β = 0.463) and EF ( β = 0.349) were positively associated with SIE, which, in turn, showed a strong positive association with APLO ( β = 0.689). All six specific indirect effects were significant, indicating statistically significant indirect associations among AI‐supported teaching, educator guidance, student inquiry, and perceived authentic learning outcomes. The findings contribute an educator‐mediated perspective to Syntegrative Education by showing that AI is most educationally meaningful when embedded in purposeful questioning, feedback, and sustained student inquiry. The study highlights the importance of designing AI‐supported industry projects around evidence evaluation, iterative feedback, reflection, and active investigation of authentic problems rather than treating AI use as an educational objective in itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future in Educational Research
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.70055
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI‐Supported Research‐Led Teaching in Syntegrative Project‐Based Learning: Educator Questioning, Feedback, and Student Learning Outcomes in Authentic Industry Projects

Duong Lam Thuy, Phi Dinh Khuong
Future in Educational Research
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

AI‐Supported Research‐Led Teaching in Syntegrative Project‐Based Learning: Educator Questioning, Feedback, and Student Learning Outcomes in Authentic Industry Projects

Duong Lam Thuy, Phi Dinh Khuong
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is creating new possibilities for connecting research‐led teaching with authentic industry projects, yet its educational value depends on how educators organize inquiry rather than on technological use alone. This study examined the relationships among AI‐supported research‐led teaching (AIRLT), educator questioning (EQ), educator feedback (EF), student inquiry engagement (SIE), and authentic project learning outcomes (APLO) within Syntegrative Project‐Based Learning. A quantitative cross‐sectional survey was conducted with 898 undergraduate students from 12 universities in Vietnam who had participated in authentic industry or organizational projects involving AI‐supported inquiry and educator guidance. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) showed that AIRLT was positively associated with EQ ( β = 0.642) and EF ( β = 0.611). Both EQ ( β = 0.463) and EF ( β = 0.349) were positively associated with SIE, which, in turn, showed a strong positive association with APLO ( β = 0.689). All six specific indirect effects were significant, indicating statistically significant indirect associations among AI‐supported teaching, educator guidance, student inquiry, and perceived authentic learning outcomes. The findings contribute an educator‐mediated perspective to Syntegrative Education by showing that AI is most educationally meaningful when embedded in purposeful questioning, feedback, and sustained student inquiry. The study highlights the importance of designing AI‐supported industry projects around evidence evaluation, iterative feedback, reflection, and active investigation of authentic problems rather than treating AI use as an educational objective in itself.

Future in Educational Research
Thai Nguyen University (VN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.