Agreement between initial in-person and follow-up telemedicine assessment in patients presenting with first-time headache

Remote healthcare services have markedly increased in recent years. Telemedicine is increasingly considered a practical alternative to in-person evaluations of chronic neurological disorders, including primary headache syndromes. However, prospective data examining its reliability during first-time consultation are limited. This study assessed the consistency between initial in-person examination and subsequent telemedicine follow-up in patients presenting with headache for the first time, and compared costs, time burden, loss of work capacity, and patient and physician satisfaction. Sixty patients (49 women and 11 men) aged 20–40 years who presented with headaches for the first time to six specialized headache clinics were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent an initial in-person examination, followed by a video-based telemedicine consultation at the same center 45 days later. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and diagnoses were recorded during interviews. Patients completed cost and burden assessment questionnaires, and both groups completed satisfaction questionnaires. Analyses examined the concordance between the two examination methods and factors influencing them. Headache history showed excellent agreement between in-person and telemedicine assessments (ICC = 0.928, 95% CI 0.882–0.956), while headache frequency and duration demonstrated moderate agreement. Localization and lateralization were consistent in more than 80% of cases, headache intensity in 77.8%, and overall diagnostic concordance reached 95%, with the highest agreement observed for migraine with and without aura. In-person outpatient examinations resulted in a mean time loss of 208.05 ± 119.78 min, whereas telemedicine reduced work-capacity time loss by 87.4%. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was high (86.2% very satisfied), and physicians rated the overall telemedicine consultation favorably (69% excellent). Patients also expressed greater willingness than physicians to use telemedicine for future follow-up visits (60% vs. 39.7%). Telemedicine shows high consistency with in-person assessments, particularly for migraine patients, and has reduced time, cost, and work loss. These findings support telemedicine as a reliable follow-up approach after an initial face-to-face assessment, particularly for patients with primary headache disorders requiring limited physical examination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-74302-z
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement between initial in-person and follow-up telemedicine assessment in patients presenting with first-time headache

Emel Ur Özçeli̇k, Emel Oğuz Akarsu, Vesile Öztürk, N Kose et al.
Scientific Reports
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Agreement between initial in-person and follow-up telemedicine assessment in patients presenting with first-time headache

Emel Ur Özçeli̇k, Emel Oğuz Akarsu, Vesile Öztürk, N Kose, Figen Gökçay, Elif Kocasoy Orhan, Furkan Sarıdaş, Müge Mercan Kara, Tuba Cerrahoğlu Şirin, Necdet Karlı, Zahra Hüseynli
article en

Abstract

Remote healthcare services have markedly increased in recent years. Telemedicine is increasingly considered a practical alternative to in-person evaluations of chronic neurological disorders, including primary headache syndromes. However, prospective data examining its reliability during first-time consultation are limited. This study assessed the consistency between initial in-person examination and subsequent telemedicine follow-up in patients presenting with headache for the first time, and compared costs, time burden, loss of work capacity, and patient and physician satisfaction. Sixty patients (49 women and 11 men) aged 20–40 years who presented with headaches for the first time to six specialized headache clinics were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent an initial in-person examination, followed by a video-based telemedicine consultation at the same center 45 days later. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and diagnoses were recorded during interviews. Patients completed cost and burden assessment questionnaires, and both groups completed satisfaction questionnaires. Analyses examined the concordance between the two examination methods and factors influencing them. Headache history showed excellent agreement between in-person and telemedicine assessments (ICC = 0.928, 95% CI 0.882–0.956), while headache frequency and duration demonstrated moderate agreement. Localization and lateralization were consistent in more than 80% of cases, headache intensity in 77.8%, and overall diagnostic concordance reached 95%, with the highest agreement observed for migraine with and without aura. In-person outpatient examinations resulted in a mean time loss of 208.05 ± 119.78 min, whereas telemedicine reduced work-capacity time loss by 87.4%. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was high (86.2% very satisfied), and physicians rated the overall telemedicine consultation favorably (69% excellent). Patients also expressed greater willingness than physicians to use telemedicine for future follow-up visits (60% vs. 39.7%). Telemedicine shows high consistency with in-person assessments, particularly for migraine patients, and has reduced time, cost, and work loss. These findings support telemedicine as a reliable follow-up approach after an initial face-to-face assessment, particularly for patients with primary headache disorders requiring limited physical examination.

Scientific Reports
MEF University (TR), Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Ege University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Kent Hastanesi (TR), Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.