Diagnostic accuracy of a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To develop a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system and validate its diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system was developed by incorporating the significant signs from the standard O-RADS MRI system. This study retrospectively enrolled the 176 adnexal masses in cohort A. MRI imaging features were compared between benign and malignant tumors within this cohort. The diagnostic performance of the two scoring models was assessed by estimating the area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). In addition, 352 adnexal lesions from cohorts B and C were included to further evaluate the diagnostic ability of the modified scoring system. RESULTS: In cohort A, the papillary projections exhibiting the sea anemone sign were highly indicative of borderline lesions (p = 0.001). Diffusion restriction in solid components significantly distinguished benign from malignant masses (p = 0.001). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of cystic components yielded a cutoff of 1.74 (p < 0.05). The DeLong test revealed no statistically significant difference in AUCs between the two systems in cohort A (p > 0.05). The NRI and IDI for the modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system were -4.13% and -0.04, respectively (all p > 0.05). In cohorts B and C, the AUCs were 0.933 and 0.910. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic efficacy of the modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system was comparable to that of the standard O-RADS MRI risk stratification system, facilitating the distinction between benign and malignant adnexal neoplasms. KEY POINTS: Question How can a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system be developed, and can this scoring system accurately classify adnexal masses? Findings The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI system demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and reliable risk stratification of adnexal masses by evaluating key imaging features. Critical relevance statement The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system contributes to the risk stratification of adnexal masses, particularly for patients who cannot undergo contrast agent administration. This system provides a reliable tool to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02425-y
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system: a retrospective study

Wen Shen, Chen Zhang, Can Cui, Yue Cheng et al.
Insights into Imaging
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Diagnostic accuracy of a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system: a retrospective study

Wen Shen, Chen Zhang, Can Cui, Yue Cheng, Wei Liao, Yan Ren, Zhijing Zhang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system and validate its diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system was developed by incorporating the significant signs from the standard O-RADS MRI system. This study retrospectively enrolled the 176 adnexal masses in cohort A. MRI imaging features were compared between benign and malignant tumors within this cohort. The diagnostic performance of the two scoring models was assessed by estimating the area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). In addition, 352 adnexal lesions from cohorts B and C were included to further evaluate the diagnostic ability of the modified scoring system. RESULTS: In cohort A, the papillary projections exhibiting the sea anemone sign were highly indicative of borderline lesions (p = 0.001). Diffusion restriction in solid components significantly distinguished benign from malignant masses (p = 0.001). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of cystic components yielded a cutoff of 1.74 (p < 0.05). The DeLong test revealed no statistically significant difference in AUCs between the two systems in cohort A (p > 0.05). The NRI and IDI for the modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system were -4.13% and -0.04, respectively (all p > 0.05). In cohorts B and C, the AUCs were 0.933 and 0.910. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic efficacy of the modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system was comparable to that of the standard O-RADS MRI risk stratification system, facilitating the distinction between benign and malignant adnexal neoplasms. KEY POINTS: Question How can a modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system be developed, and can this scoring system accurately classify adnexal masses? Findings The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI system demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and reliable risk stratification of adnexal masses by evaluating key imaging features. Critical relevance statement The modified non-contrast O-RADS MRI scoring system contributes to the risk stratification of adnexal masses, particularly for patients who cannot undergo contrast agent administration. This system provides a reliable tool to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
Nankai University (CN), Tianjin First Center Hospital (CN), People's Liberation Army 401 Hospital (CN), Jinhua Central Hospital (CN), Siemens (China) (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Tianjin Science and Technology Program
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.